Yep, makes sense. Thanks for the quick response!

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 12:04 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually yeah that is how the release vote works by default at Apache:
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> However I would imagine there is broad consent to just roll another RC if
> there's any objection or -1. We could formally re-check the votes, as I
> think the +1s would agree, but think we've defaulted into accepting a
> 'veto' if there are otherwise no objections.
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:01 PM Jonathan Kelly <jonathaka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Yuming,
>>
>> In your original email, you said that the vote "passes if a majority +1
>> PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes". There were four +1 votes
>> (all from PMC members) and one -1 (also from a PMC member), so shouldn't
>> the vote pass because both requirements (majority +1 and minimum of 3 +1
>> votes) were met?
>>
>> I don't personally mind either way if the vote is considered passed or
>> failed (and I see you've already cut the v3.3.1-rc3 tag but haven't started
>> the new vote yet), but I just wanted to ask for clarification on the
>> requirements.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Jonathan Kelly
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 7:49 PM Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Thank you all for testing and voting!
>>>
>>> There's a -1 vote here, so I think this RC fails. I will prepare for
>>> RC3 soon.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:34 AM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 from me, with a few comments.
>>>>
>>>> I saw the following failures, are these known issues/flakey tests ?
>>>>
>>>> * PersistenceEngineSuite.ZooKeeperPersistenceEngine
>>>> Looks like a port conflict issue from a quick look into logs (conflict
>>>> with starting admin port at 8080) - is this expected behavior for the test 
>>>> ?
>>>> I worked around it by shutting down the process which was using the
>>>> port - though did not investigate deeply.
>>>>
>>>> * org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveExternalCatalogVersionsSuite was aborted
>>>> It is expecting these artifacts in $HOME/.m2/repository
>>>>
>>>> 1. tomcat#jasper-compiler;5.5.23!jasper-compiler.jar
>>>> 2. tomcat#jasper-runtime;5.5.23!jasper-runtime.jar
>>>> 3. commons-el#commons-el;1.0!commons-el.jar
>>>> 4. org.apache.hive#hive-exec;2.3.7!hive-exec.jar
>>>>
>>>> I worked around it by adding them locally explicitly - we should
>>>> probably  add them as test dependency ?
>>>> Not sure if this changed in this release though (I had cleaned my local
>>>> .m2 recently)
>>>>
>>>> Other than this, rest looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mridul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 2:56 PM Sean Owen <sro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me, same result as last RC.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:21 AM Yuming Wang <wgy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 
>>>>>> 3.3.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time October 3th and passes if a 
>>>>>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.3.1
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.3.1-rc2 (commit 
>>>>>> 1d3b8f7cb15283a1e37ecada6d751e17f30647ce):
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.3.1-rc2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.1-rc2-bin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1421
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.3.1-rc2-docs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.3.1 can be found at the following URL:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12351710
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.3.1-rc2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FAQ
>>>>>>
>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>> How can I help test this release?
>>>>>> =========================
>>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>>>>> reporting any regressions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>>>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
>>>>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>>>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>>>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.3.1?
>>>>>> ===========================================
>>>>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.3.1 can be found at:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target 
>>>>>> Version/s" = 3.3.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>>>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>>>>>> appropriate release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>>>>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>>>>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>>>>>> help target the issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to