Am 18.02.21 um 16:34 schrieb Sean Owen:
One other aspect is that a committer is taking some degree of responsibility for merging a change, so the ask is more than just a few minutes of eyeballing. If it breaks something the merger pretty much owns resolving it, and, the whole project owns any consequence of the change for the future.
I think this explains the hesitation pretty well: Committers take ownership of the change. It is understandable that PRs then have to be very convincing with low risk/benefit ratio.
Are there plans or initiatives to proactively widen the base of committers to mitigate the current situation?
Enrico --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
