On my side, I'll try to identify any possible problems by the end of the week or so (at somewhat crude inspection there is nothing unexpected or particularly hard to resolve, but sometimes problem occur when you try to refine things) and I'll post an update. Maybe we could take it from there?
In general I'd expect that there will be some work to be done in the
following areas
* Providing at least basic contributor guidelines ‒ as already
discussed annotations can server different purpose and take
different approach to certain issues. I expect this might evolve
over time, but it might be nice to have something to start.
* CI pipeline. Codebase MyPy tests are usually not sufficient ‒ right
now I test against patched examples and using some additional data
driven case, but once combined, we can explore other options
(doctests are nice lead)
In short term there are also some upstream changes that haven't been
reflected in stubs master...
On 8/27/20 10:24 PM, Driesprong, Fokko wrote:
> . Any action points that we can define and that I can help on? I'm
> fine with taking the route that Hyukjin suggests :)
>
--
Best regards,
Maciej Szymkiewicz
Web: https://zero323.net
Keybase: https://keybase.io/zero323
Gigs: https://www.codementor.io/@zero323
PGP: A30CEF0C31A501EC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
