Hi Folks, So, I am back, and searched the JIRAS with target version as "2.4.7" and Resolved, found only 2 jiras. So, are we good to go, with just a couple of jiras fixed ? Shall I proceed with making a RC?
Thanks, Prashant On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:23 PM Prashant Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you, Holden. > > Folks, My health has gone down a bit. So, I will start working on this in > a few days. If this needs to be published sooner, then maybe someone else > has to help out. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:11 AM Holden Karau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I’m happy to have Prashant do 2.4.7 :) >> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:40 PM Xiao Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 on releasing both 3.0.1 and 2.4.7 >>> >>> Great! Three committers volunteer to be a release manager. Ruifeng, >>> Prashant and Holden. Holden just helped release Spark 2.4.6. This time, >>> maybe, Ruifeng and Prashant can be the release manager of 3.0.1 and 2.4.7 >>> respectively. >>> >>> Xiao >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 2:24 PM Jungtaek Lim < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32148 was reported >>>> yesterday, and if the report is valid it looks to be a blocker. I'll try to >>>> take a look sooner. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Shivaram Venkataraman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Holden -- it would be great to also get 2.4.7 started >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Shivaram >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:31 PM Holden Karau <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I can take care of 2.4.7 unless someone else wants to do it. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 8:29 PM Jason Moore < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi all, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Could I get some input on the severity of this one that I found >>>>> yesterday? If that’s a correctness issue, should it block this patch? >>>>> Let >>>>> me know under the ticket if there’s more info that I can provide to help. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32136 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Jason. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> From: Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> >>>>> >> Date: Wednesday, 1 July 2020 at 10:20 am >>>>> >> To: Shivaram Venkataraman <[email protected]> >>>>> >> Cc: Prashant Sharma <[email protected]>, 郑瑞峰 < >>>>> [email protected]>, Gengliang Wang <[email protected]>, >>>>> gurwls223 <[email protected]>, Dongjoon Hyun < >>>>> [email protected]>, Jules Damji <[email protected]>, Holden >>>>> Karau <[email protected]>, Reynold Xin <[email protected]>, >>>>> Yuanjian Li <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" < >>>>> [email protected]>, Takeshi Yamamuro <[email protected]> >>>>> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Spark 3.0.1 Release >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> SPARK-32130 [1] looks to be a performance regression introduced in >>>>> Spark 3.0.0, which is ideal to look into before releasing another bugfix >>>>> version. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32130 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 7:05 AM Shivaram Venkataraman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi all >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I just wanted to ping this thread to see if all the outstanding >>>>> blockers for 3.0.1 have been fixed. If so, it would be great if we can get >>>>> the release going. The CRAN team sent us a note that the version SparkR >>>>> available on CRAN for the current R version (4.0.2) is broken and hence we >>>>> need to update the package soon -- it will be great to do it with 3.0.1. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Shivaram >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 8:31 PM Prashant Sharma < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 for 3.0.1 release. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I too can help out as release manager. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 4:58 AM 郑瑞峰 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I volunteer to be a release manager of 3.0.1, if nobody is working >>>>> on this. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 发件人: "Gengliang Wang"<[email protected]>; >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 发送时间: 2020年6月24日(星期三) 下午4:15 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 收件人: "Hyukjin Kwon"<[email protected]>; >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 抄送: "Dongjoon Hyun"<[email protected]>;"Jungtaek Lim"< >>>>> [email protected]>;"Jules Damji"<[email protected]>;"Holden >>>>> Karau"<[email protected]>;"Reynold Xin"<[email protected]>;"Shivaram >>>>> Venkataraman"<[email protected]>;"Yuanjian Li"< >>>>> [email protected]>;"Spark dev list"<[email protected]>;"Takeshi >>>>> Yamamuro"<[email protected]>; >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Spark 3.0.1 Release >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1, the issues mentioned are really serious. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:56 PM Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Just as a note, >>>>> >> - SPARK-31918 is fixed now, and there's no blocker. - When we build >>>>> SparkR, we should use the latest R version at least 4.0.0+. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 2020년 6월 24일 (수) 오전 11:20, Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>님이 >>>>> 작성: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Bests, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Dongjoon. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jungtaek Lim < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 on a 3.0.1 soon. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Probably it would be nice if some Scala experts can take a look at >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32051 and include the fix >>>>> into 3.0.1 if possible. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Looks like APIs designed to work with Scala 2.11 & Java bring >>>>> ambiguity in Scala 2.12 & Java. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:52 AM Jules Damji <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Pardon the dumb thumb typos :) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Jun 23, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Holden Karau <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 on a patch release soon >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:47 AM Reynold Xin <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Error! Filename not specified. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 on doing a new patch release soon. I saw some of these issues >>>>> when preparing the 3.0 release, and some of them are very serious. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:06 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> +1 Thanks Yuanjian -- I think it'll be great to have a 3.0.1 >>>>> release soon. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Shivaram >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:43 AM Takeshi Yamamuro < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks for the heads-up, Yuanjian! >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> wow, the updates are so quick. Anyway, +1 for the release. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Bests, >>>>> >> Takeshi >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:59 PM Yuanjian Li <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi dev-list, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I’m writing this to raise the discussion about Spark 3.0.1 >>>>> feasibility since 4 blocker issues were found after Spark 3.0.0: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> [SPARK-31990] The state store compatibility broken will cause a >>>>> correctness issue when Streaming query with `dropDuplicate` uses the >>>>> checkpoint written by the old Spark version. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> [SPARK-32038] The regression bug in handling NaN values in >>>>> COUNT(DISTINCT) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> [SPARK-31918][WIP] CRAN requires to make it working with the latest >>>>> R 4.0. It makes the 3.0 release unavailable on CRAN, and only supports R >>>>> [3.5, 4.0) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> [SPARK-31967] Downgrade vis.js to fix Jobs UI loading time >>>>> regression >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I also noticed branch-3.0 already has 39 commits after Spark 3.0.0. >>>>> I think it would be great if we have Spark 3.0.1 to deliver the critical >>>>> fixes. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Any comments are appreciated. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Best, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Yuanjian >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> --- >>>>> >> Takeshi Yamamuro >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To >>>>> unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>>>> > Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 >>>>> > YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> <https://databricks.com/sparkaisummit/north-america> >>> >> -- >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> >> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >> >
