Great. Sean. Then, what is your criteria to remove the targeting it from 2.4.5?
It doesn't depend on `Who`, right? Bests, Dongjoon. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:56 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK what if anything is in question for 2.4.5? I don't see anything open > and targeted for it. > Are we talking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28344 - > targeted for 2.4.5 but not backported, and a 'correctness' issue? > Simply: who argues this must hold up 2.4.5, and if so what's the status? > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:27 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, Nicholas and all. >> >> RC2 is blocked by the community policy on correctness/dataloss issues. >> >> I cut the RC1 when there were no correctness/dataloss issue targeting on >> 2.4.5. However, it fails because one correctness issue (target = 3.0.0) is >> resolved and the community changes the target to 2.4.5 at the last day of >> RC1 vote. >> >> As of now, there exists 2.4.5 targeting correctness issue. As a release >> manager, I cannot cut RC2 until there is no correctness/dataloss issue with >> target=2.4.5. We need to fix it or we need to move the target version to >> 2.4.6. >> >> That's the current situation. I'm trying to follow the existing community >> policies, but it seems too idealistic for the release. I'm trying to figure >> out what is the best option for 2.4.5 in the community. Hopefully, we can >> start RC2 without known risks at least. >> >> For non-correctness issues, it's up to the progress and decision on them. >> Those issues are not blockers. >> >> Bests, >> Dongjoon. >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:39 Nicholas Marion <nmar...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Was wondering if RC2 is expected to release soon? Any chance that >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30310 could be added to >>> branch-2.4 as well for 2.4.5 release? Especially since 2.4.x introduced the >>> bug? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> *NICHOLAS T. MARION * >>> IBM Open Data Analytics for z/OS - *CPO* and *Service Team Lead* >>> ------------------------------ >>> *Phone: *1-845-433-5010 | *Tie-Line: *293-5010 >>> *E-mail:* *nmar...@us.ibm.com* <nmar...@us.ibm.com> >>> *Find me on:* [image: LinkedIn: >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasmarion] >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasmarion> >>> [image: IBM] >>> >>> 2455 South Rd >>> Poughkeepie, New York 12601-5400 >>> United States >>> [image: IBM Redbooks Silver Author][image: Data Science Foundations - >>> Level 1] >>> >>> >>> [image: Inactive hide details for Dongjoon Hyun ---01/20/2020 11:27:19 >>> PM---Hi, All. RC2 was scheduled on Today and all RC1 feedbacks s]Dongjoon >>> Hyun ---01/20/2020 11:27:19 PM---Hi, All. RC2 was scheduled on Today and >>> all RC1 feedbacks seems to be addressed. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> >>> To: dev <dev@spark.apache.org> >>> Date: 01/20/2020 11:27 PM >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Spark 2.4.5 RC2 Preparation Status >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, All. >>> >>> RC2 was scheduled on Today and all RC1 feedbacks seems to be addressed. >>> However, I'm waiting for another on-going correctness PR. >>> >>> *https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27233* >>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27233> >>> [SPARK-29701][SQL] Correct behaviours of group analytical queries >>> when empty input given >>> >>> Unlike the other correctness issues (I sent previsouly), this one is >>> active enough to make RC2 fail. As we know, Spark 2.4.5 RC1 vote failed >>> because the correctness patch landed on `master` branch during the RC1 vote >>> period and there was official requests for backporting. >>> >>> *https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27229* >>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27229> >>> [SPARK-29708][SQL][2.4] Correct aggregated values when grouping sets >>> are duplicated >>> >>> It's risk to start RC2 without considering it because VOTE is also >>> consuming the community resources. >>> >>> BTW, if there is another on-going notable PR for 2.4.5 RC1, please reply >>> to me. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dongjoon. >>> >>> >>>