Hi @Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> , Thanks for reply. We know that Spark community has own release date and plan. We are happy to follow Spark community. But we think it's great if community could add a sentence into the next releasenotes and claim "Spark can support Arm from this release." after we finish the test work on ARM. That's all. We just want a community official caliber that spark support ARM for attracting more users to use spark.
Thank you very much for your patient. BR ZhaoBo [image: Mailtrack] <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> Sender notified by Mailtrack <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> 19/11/15 上午10:59:29 Tianhua huang <huangtianhua...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月15日周五 上午10:25写道： > @Sean, > Yes, you are right, we don't have to create a separate release of Spark > for ARM, it's enough to add a releasenote to say that Spark supports > arm architecture. > About the test failure, one or two tests will timeout on our poor > performance arm instance sometimes, now we donate a high performance arm > instance to amplab, and wait shane to build the jobs on it. > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:13 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't quite understand. You are saying tests don't pass yet, so why >> would anyone yet run these tests regularly? >> If it's because the instances aren't fast enough, use bigger instances? >> I don't think anyone would create a separate release of Spark for ARM, >> no. But why would that be necessary? >> >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:28 PM bo zhaobo <bzhaojyathousa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Spark team, >>> >>> Any ideas about the above email? Thank you. >>> >>> BR >>> >>> ZhaoBo >>> >>> >>> [image: Mailtrack] >>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> >>> Sender >>> notified by >>> Mailtrack >>> <https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;> >>> 19/11/15 >>> 上午09:26:17 >>> >>> Tianhua huang <huangtianhua...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月12日周二 下午2:47写道： >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Spark arm jobs have built for some time, and now there are two jobs[1] >>>> spark-master-test-maven-arm >>>> <https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-maven-arm/> >>>> and spark-master-test-python-arm >>>> <https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-python-arm/>, >>>> we can see there are some build failures, but it because of the poor >>>> performance of the arm instance, and now we begin to build spark arm jobs >>>> on other high performance instances, and the build/test are all success, we >>>> plan to donate the instance to amplab later. According to the build >>>> history, we are very happy to say spark is supported on aarch64 platform, >>>> and I suggest to add this good news into spark-3.0.0 releasenotes. Maybe >>>> community could provide an arm-supported release of spark at the meanwhile? >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-maven-arm/ >>>> >>>> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-python-arm/ >>>> >>>> >>>> ps: the jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29106 trace >>>> the whole work, thank you very much Shane:) >>>> >>>
