and in this case, i'm actually benefiting from the columns of arrow
support, so that i can pass the whole data block to tensorflow to obtain
the block of prediction all at once.


On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:45 PM peng yu <yupb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> pandas/arrow is for the memory efficiency, and mapPartitions is only
> available to rdds, for sure i can do everything in rdd.
>
> But i thought that's the whole point of having pandas_udf, so my program
> run faster and consumes less memory ?
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:40 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you just applying a function to every row in the DataFrame? you
>> don't need pandas at all. Just get the RDD of Row from it and map a
>> UDF that makes another Row, and go back to DataFrame. Or make a UDF
>> that operates on all columns and returns a new value. mapPartitions is
>> also available if you want to transform an iterator of Row to another
>> iterator of Row.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:33 PM peng yu <yupb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > it is very similar to SCALAR, but for SCALAR the output can't be
>> struct/row and the input has to be pd.Series, which doesn't support a row.
>> >
>> > I'm doing tensorflow batch inference in spark,
>> https://github.com/yupbank/tf-spark-serving/blob/master/tss/serving.py#L108
>> >
>> > Which i have to do the groupBy in order to use the apply function, i'm
>> wondering why not just enable apply to df ?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:15 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Are you looking for SCALAR? that lets you map one row to one row, but
>> >> do it more efficiently in batch. What are you trying to do?
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM peng yu <yupb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm looking for a mapPartition(pandas_udf) for  a pyspark.Dataframe.
>> >> >
>> >> > ```
>> >> > @pandas_udf(df.schema, PandasUDFType.MAP)
>> >> > def do_nothing(pandas_df):
>> >> >     return pandas_df
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > new_df = df.mapPartition(do_nothing)
>> >> > ```
>> >> > pandas_udf only support scala or GROUPED_MAP.  Why not support just
>> Map?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:57 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Are you looking for @pandas_udf in Python? Or just mapPartition?
>> Those exist already
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 1:43 PM peng yu <yupb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> There is a nice map_partition function in R `dapply`.  so that
>> user can pass a row to udf.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I'm wondering why we don't have that in python?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I'm trying to have a map_partition function with pandas_udf
>> supported
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> thanks!
>>
>

Reply via email to