+1

Btw, as Ryan pointed out las time, +0 doesn't mean "Don't really care."
Official definitions here:

https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions


   -

   +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
   -

   -0: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.'


On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:27 AM Mingjie <tangr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> mingjie
>
> On Mar 1, 2019, at 10:18 PM, Xingbo Jiang <jiangxb1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Start with +1 from myself.
>
> Xingbo Jiang <jiangxb1...@gmail.com> 于2019年3月1日周五 下午10:14写道:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I want to call for a vote of SPARK-24615
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24615>. It improves Spark
>> by making it aware of GPUs exposed by cluster managers, and hence Spark can
>> match GPU resources with user task requests properly. The proposal
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C4J_BPOcSCJc58HL7JfHtIzHrjU0rLRdQM3y7ejil64/edit?usp=sharing>
>>  and production doc
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/12JjloksHCdslMXhdVZ3xY5l1Nde3HRhIrqvzGnK_bNE/edit?usp=sharing>
>>  was
>> made available on dev@ to collect input. Your can also find a design
>> sketch at SPARK-27005 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-27005>
>> .
>>
>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote:
>>
>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP.
>> +0: Don't really care.
>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following technical
>> reasons.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Xingbo
>>
>

Reply via email to