To be clear, is this about "python-friendly API" or "friendly python API" ?
On the python side, it might be nice to take advantage of static typing. Requires python 3.6 but with python 2 going EOL, a spark-3.0 might be a good opportunity to jump the python-3-only train. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote: > Since we're talking about Spark 3.0 in the near future (and since some > recent conversation on a proposed change reminded me) I wanted to open up > the floor and see if folks have any ideas on how we could make a more > Python friendly API for 3.0? I'm planning on taking some time to look at > other systems in the solution space and see what we might want to learn > from them but I'd love to hear what other folks are thinking too. > > -- > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/ > 2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> > YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >
