+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:12 AM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
> +1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will > remove the existing plans. > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue <b...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we >> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for >> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal. >> >> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans >> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d> >> . >> >> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to >> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote. >> >> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >> >> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP >> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . . >> >> Thanks for voting, everyone! >> >> -- >> Ryan Blue >> >
