So there are a few bots along this line in OSS. If no one objects I’ll take a look and find one which matches our use case and try it out.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:33 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Certainly I will frequently dig through 'git blame' to figure out who > might be the right reviewer. Maybe that's automatable -- ping the person > who last touched the most lines touched by the PR? There might be some > false positives there. And I suppose the downside is being pinged forever > for some change that just isn't well considered or one of those accidental > 100K-line PRs. So maybe some way to decline or silence is important, or > maybe just ping once and leave it. Sure, a bot that just adds a "Would @foo > like to review?" comment on Github? Sure seems worth trying if someone is > willing to do the work to cook up the bot. > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:22 PM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote: > >> Hi friends, >> >> Was chatting with some folks at the summit and I was wondering how people >> would feel about adding a review bot to ping folks. We already have the >> review dashboard but I was thinking we could ping folks who were the >> original authors of the code being changed whom might not be in the habit >> of looking at the review dashboard. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Holden :) >> -- >> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> > -- Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
