This is a bug introduced in 2.1. It works fine in 2.0

2017-09-16 16:15 GMT-07:00 Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>:

> Ok :) Was this working in 2.1.1?
>
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 3:59 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Still -1
>>
>> Unable to pass the tests in my local environment. Open a JIRA
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22041
>>
>> - SPARK-16625: General data types to be mapped to Oracle *** FAILED ***
>>
>>   types.apply(9).equals(org.apache.spark.sql.types.DateType) was false
>> (OracleIntegrationSuite.scala:158)
>>
>> Xiao
>>
>> 2017-09-15 17:35 GMT-07:00 Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid>:
>>
>>> -1 (with my Apache member hat on, non-binding)
>>>
>>> I'll continue discussion in the other thread, but I don't think we
>>> should share signing keys.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed it's limited to a people with login permissions on the Jenkins
>>>> host (and perhaps further limited, I'm not certain). Shane probably knows
>>>> more about the ACLs, so I'll ask him in the other thread for specifics.
>>>>
>>>> This is maybe branching a bit from the question of the current RC
>>>> though, so I'd suggest we continue this discussion on the thread Sean Owen
>>>> made.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:04 PM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not familiar with the release procedure, can you send a link to
>>>>> this Jenkins job? Can anyone run this job, or is it limited to committers?
>>>>>
>>>>> rb
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a good question, I built the release candidate however the
>>>>>> Jenkins scripts don't take a parameter for configuring who signs them
>>>>>> rather it always signs them with Patrick's key. You can see this from
>>>>>> previous releases which were managed by other folks but still signed by
>>>>>> Patrick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The signature is valid, but why was the release signed with Patrick
>>>>>>> Wendell's private key? Did Patrick build the release candidate?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rb
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:57 PM Felix Cheung <
>>>>>>>> felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 tested SparkR package on Windows, r-hub, Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _____________________________
>>>>>>>>> From: Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:12 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC1)
>>>>>>>>> To: Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>, <dev@spark.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>> Very nice. The sigs and hashes look fine, it builds fine for me on
>>>>>>>>> Debian Stretch with Java 8, yarn/hive/hadoop-2.7 profiles, and passes
>>>>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes as you say, no outstanding issues except for this which
>>>>>>>>> doesn't look critical, as it's not a regression.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SPARK-21985 PySpark PairDeserializer is broken for double-zipped
>>>>>>>>> RDDs
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:47 PM Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>>>>>>>>> version 2.1.2. The vote is open until Friday September 22nd at
>>>>>>>>>> 18:00 PST and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are
>>>>>>>>>> cast.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.2
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>>>>>>>>>> https://spark.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v2.1.2-rc1
>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v2.1.2-rc1> (
>>>>>>>>>> 6f470323a0363656999dd36cb33f528afe627c12)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> List of JIRA tickets resolved in this release can be found with
>>>>>>>>>> this filter.
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20134?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.2>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>>>>>>>>> found at:
>>>>>>>>>> https://home.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-
>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.2-rc1-bin/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>> orgapachespark-1248/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>>>>>>> https://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-
>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.2-rc1-docs/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *FAQ*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *How can I help test this release?*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by
>>>>>>>>>> taking an existing Spark workload and running on this release 
>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>> then reporting any regressions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and
>>>>>>>>>> install the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the
>>>>>>>>>> Java/Scala you can add the staging repository to your projects 
>>>>>>>>>> resolvers
>>>>>>>>>> and test with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache 
>>>>>>>>>> before/after
>>>>>>>>>> so you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.1.2?*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important
>>>>>>>>>> bug fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility 
>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.1.3.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *But my bug isn't fixed!??!*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>>>>>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from 2.1.1. That 
>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>> said if there is something which is a regression form 2.1.1 that has 
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> been correctly targeted please ping a committer to help target the 
>>>>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>>>> (you can see the open issues listed as impacting Spark 2.1.1 &
>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.2
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21985?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20status%20%3D%20OPEN%20AND%20(affectedVersion%20%3D%202.1.2%20OR%20affectedVersion%20%3D%202.1.1)>
>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *What are the unresolved* issues targeted for 2.1.2
>>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21985?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20%22Target%20Version%2Fs%22%20%3D%202.1.2>
>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At the time of the writing, there is one in progress major issue
>>>>>>>>>> SPARK-21985 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21985>,
>>>>>>>>>> I believe Andrew Ray & HyukjinKwon are looking into this one.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>> Netflix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> Netflix
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>> Software Engineer
>>> Netflix
>>>
>>
>> --
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>

Reply via email to