-1 Spark 2.2 is unable to read the partitioned table created by Spark 2.1 or earlier.
Opened a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-21085 Will fix it soon. Thanks, Xiao Li 2017-06-13 9:39 GMT-07:00 Joseph Bradley <jos...@databricks.com>: > Re: the QA JIRAs: > Thanks for discussing them. I still feel they are very helpful; I > particularly notice not having to spend a solid 2-3 weeks of time QAing > (unlike in earlier Spark releases). One other point not mentioned above: I > think they serve as a very helpful reminder/training for the community for > rigor in development. Since we instituted QA JIRAs, contributors have been > a lot better about adding in docs early, rather than waiting until the end > of the cycle (though I know this is drawing conclusions from correlations). > > I would vote in favor of the RC...but I'll wait to see about the reported > failures. > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> Different errors as in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20520 but >> that's also reporting R test failures. >> >> I went back and tried to run the R tests and they passed, at least on >> Ubuntu 17 / R 3.3. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> All Scala, Python tests pass. ML QA and doc issues are resolved (as well >>> as R it seems). >>> >>> However, I'm seeing the following test failure on R consistently: >>> https://gist.github.com/MLnick/5f26152f97ae8473f807c6895817cf72 >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 at 08:48 Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 non-binding >>>> >>>> Tested on macOS Sierra, Ubuntu 16.04 >>>> test suite includes various test cases including Spark SQL, ML, >>>> GraphFrames, Structured Streaming >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:40 PM vaquar khan <vaquar.k...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 non-binding >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> vaquar khan >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 7, 2017 4:32 PM, "Ricardo Almeida" < >>>>> ricardo.alme...@actnowib.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Built and tested with -Phadoop-2.7 -Dhadoop.version=2.7.3 -Pyarn >>>>> -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pscala-2.11 on >>>>> >>>>> - Ubuntu 17.04, Java 8 (OpenJDK 1.8.0_111) >>>>> - macOS 10.12.5 Java 8 (build 1.8.0_131) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5 June 2017 at 21:14, Michael Armbrust <mich...@databricks.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark >>>>>> version 2.2.0. The vote is open until Thurs, June 8th, 2017 at 12:00 >>>>>> PST and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.2.0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v2.2.0-rc4 >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v2.2.0-rc4> (377cfa8ac7ff7a8 >>>>>> a6a6d273182e18ea7dc25ce7e) >>>>>> >>>>>> List of JIRA tickets resolved can be found with this filter >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20134?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.2.0> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found >>>>>> at: >>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.2.0-rc4-bin/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc >>>>>> >>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>> spark-1241/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.2. >>>>>> 0-rc4-docs/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *FAQ* >>>>>> >>>>>> *How can I help test this release?* >>>>>> >>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking >>>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then >>>>>> reporting any regressions. >>>>>> >>>>>> *What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.2.0?* >>>>>> >>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug >>>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should be >>>>>> worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.3.0 or 2.2.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> *But my bug isn't fixed!??!* >>>>>> >>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the >>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from 2.1.1. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > > > -- > > Joseph Bradley > > Software Engineer - Machine Learning > > Databricks, Inc. > > [image: http://databricks.com] <http://databricks.com/> >