WontFix or Later is fine. There's not really any practical distinction. I figure that if something times out and is closed, it's very unlikely to be looked at again. Therefore marking it as something to do 'later' seemed less accurate.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:30 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank for your comment! > I'm just thinking I'll set "Won't Fix" though, "Later" is also okay. > But, I re-checked "Contributing to JIRA Maintenance" in the contribution > guide (http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html) and > I couldn't find any setting policy about "Later". > So, IMO it's okay to set "Won't Fix" for now and those who'd like to make > prs feel free to (re?-)open tickets. > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Hi, Takeshi. > > > So, IMO it seems okay to close tickets about "Improvement" and "New > Feature" for now. > > I'm just wondering about what kind of field value you want to fill in the > `Resolution` field for those issues. > > Maybe, 'Later'? Or, 'Won't Fix'? > > Bests, > Dongjoon. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > > > > > -- > --- > Takeshi Yamamuro >
