+1 from me too, same result as my RC3 vote/testing. On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version > 2.0.1. The vote is open until Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 20:00 PDT and passes if a > majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1 > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc4 > (933d2c1ea4e5f5c4ec8d375b5ccaa4577ba4be38) > > This release candidate resolves 301 issues: > https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc4-bin/ > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1203/ > > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc4-docs/ > > > Q: How can I help test this release? > A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an > existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then > reporting any regressions from 2.0.0. > > Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release? > A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Bugs already present > in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new features will not > necessarily block this release. > > Q: What fix version should I use for patches merging into branch-2.0 from > now on? > A: Please mark the fix version as 2.0.2, rather than 2.0.1. If a new RC > (i.e. RC5) is cut, I will change the fix version of those patches to 2.0.1. > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org