And that PR as promised: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12456

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Grant Digby <dig...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah that would work although I was worried that they used
> InheritableThreadLocal vs Threadlocal because they did want the child
> threads to inherit the parent's executionId, maybe to stop the child
> threads
> from kicking off their own queries whilst working for the parent. I think
> the fix would be to somehow ensure the child's execution.id was cleared
> when
> the parents is.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-spark-
> developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/IllegalArgumentException-
> spark-sql-execution-id-is-already-set-tp19124p19145.html
> Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Want to work at Handy? Check out our culture deck and open roles 
<http://www.handy.com/careers>
Latest news <http://www.handy.com/press> at Handy
Handy just raised $50m 
<http://venturebeat.com/2015/11/02/on-demand-home-service-handy-raises-50m-in-round-led-by-fidelity/>
 led 
by Fidelity

Reply via email to