+1 -- I think the minor releases were taking more like 4 months than 3
months anyway, and it was good for the reasons you give. This reflects
reality and is a good thing. All the better if we then can more
comfortably really follow the timeline.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
> We are 2 months past releasing Spark 2.0.0, an important milestone for the
> project. Spark 2.0.0 deviated (took 6 month from the regular release cadence
> we had for the 1.x line, and we never explicitly discussed what the release
> cadence should look like for 2.x. Thus this email.
>
> During Spark 1.x, roughly every three months we make a new 1.x feature
> release (e.g. 1.5.0 comes out three months after 1.4.0). Development
> happened primarily in the first two months, and then a release branch was
> cut at the end of month 2, and the last month was reserved for QA and
> release preparation.
>
> During 2.0.0 development, I really enjoyed the longer release cycle because
> there was a lot of major changes happening and the longer time was critical
> for thinking through architectural changes as well as API design. While I
> don't expect the same degree of drastic changes in a 2.x feature release, I
> do think it'd make sense to increase the length of release cycle so we can
> make better designs.
>
> My strawman proposal is to maintain a regular release cadence, as we did in
> Spark 1.x, and increase the cycle from 3 months to 4 months. This
> effectively gives us ~50% more time to develop (in reality it'd be slightly
> less than 50% since longer dev time also means longer QA time). As for
> maintenance releases, I think those should still be cut on-demand, similar
> to Spark 1.x, but more aggressively.
>
> To put this into perspective, 4-month cycle means we will release Spark
> 2.1.0 at the end of Nov or early Dec (and branch cut / code freeze at the
> end of Oct).
>
> I am curious what others think.
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to