Seems fair & easy to support. Can somebody open a JIRA ticket and patch?
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Since `Literal#default` can handle array types, it seems there is no > strong reason > for unsupporting the type in `Literal#apply`, that is, `functions.lit`. > https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/ > catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ > expressions/literals.scala#L119 > > // maropu > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Jason White <jason.wh...@shopify.com> > wrote: > >> Continuing to dig, I encountered: >> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/catalyst/ >> src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions >> /LiteralExpressionSuite.scala#L125 >> >> // TODO(davies): add tests for ArrayType, MapType and StructType >> >> I guess others have thought of this already, just not implemented yet. :) >> >> For others reading this thread, someone suggested using a SQL UDF to >> return >> the constant - this works as a hack for now. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-spark-developers >> -list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ArrayType-support-in-Spark- >> SQL-tp19063p19065.html >> Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > --- > Takeshi Yamamuro >
