The binary artifact that's published here is built with -Pmesos. The 'real' artifact from a process standpoint is the source release, however. That's why we do (should) test the source release foremost.
I suppose individuals are invited to test with a configuration that is of interest to them, and so I enable just the flags I would care to test I suppose. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl> wrote: > Hi, > > I keep asking myself why are you guys not including -Pmesos in your > builds? Is this on purpose or have you overlooked it? > > Pozdrawiam, > Jacek Laskowski > ---- > https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/ > Mastering Apache Spark 2.0 http://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark > Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: >> +1 (non binding) >> >> I compiled and tested on the following two systems. >> >> - CentOS 7.2 / Oracle JDK 1.8.0_77 / R 3.3.1 with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 >> -Pkinesis-asl -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Dsparkr >> - CentOS 7.2 / Open JDK 1.8.0_102 with -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Pkinesis-asl >> -Phive -Phive-thriftserver >> >> Bests, >> Dongjoon. >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Not that it could fix the issue but no -Pmesos? >>> >>> Jacek >>> >>> >>> On 24 Sep 2016 12:08 a.m., "Sean Owen" <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 Signatures and hashes check out. I checked that the Kinesis >>>> assembly artifacts are not present. >>>> >>>> I compiled and tested on Java 8 / Ubuntu 16 with -Pyarn -Phive >>>> -Phive-thriftserver -Phadoop-2.7 -Psparkr and only saw one test >>>> problem. This test never completed. If nobody else sees it, +1, >>>> assuming it's a bad test or env issue. >>>> >>>> - should clone and clean line object in ClosureCleaner *** FAILED *** >>>> isContain was true Interpreter output contained 'Exception': >>>> Welcome to >>>> ____ __ >>>> / __/__ ___ _____/ /__ >>>> _\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/ '_/ >>>> /___/ .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\ version 2.0.1 >>>> /_/ >>>> >>>> Using Scala version 2.11.8 (OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_91) >>>> Type in expressions to have them evaluated. >>>> Type :help for more information. >>>> >>>> scala> // Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish) >>>> >>>> >>>> // Exiting paste mode, now interpreting. >>>> >>>> org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job 0 cancelled because >>>> SparkContext was shut down >>>> at >>>> org.apache.spark.scheduler.DAGScheduler$$anonfun$cleanUpAfterSchedulerStop$1.apply(DAGScheduler.scala:818) >>>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: >>>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark >>>> > version >>>> > 2.0.1. The vote is open until Sunday, Sep 25, 2016 at 23:59 PDT and >>>> > passes >>>> > if a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast. >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1 >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc2 >>>> > (04141ad49806a48afccc236b699827997142bd57) >>>> > >>>> > This release candidate resolves 284 issues: >>>> > https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira >>>> > >>>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc2-bin/ >>>> > >>>> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >>>> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc >>>> > >>>> > The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1199 >>>> > >>>> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc2-docs/ >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Q: How can I help test this release? >>>> > A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking >>>> > an >>>> > existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then >>>> > reporting any regressions from 2.0.0. >>>> > >>>> > Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release? >>>> > A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Bugs already >>>> > present >>>> > in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new features will not >>>> > necessarily block this release. >>>> > >>>> > Q: What happened to 2.0.1 RC1? >>>> > A: There was an issue with RC1 R documentation during release candidate >>>> > preparation. As a result, rc1 was canceled before a vote was called. >>>> > >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
