I agree, we should not be publishing both of them.
Thanks for bringing this up !

Regards,
Mridul


On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> It's worth calling attention to:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17418
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17422
>
> It looks like we need to at least not publish the kinesis *assembly*
> Maven artifact because it contains Amazon Software Licensed-code
> directly.
>
> However there's a reasonably strong reason to believe that we'd have
> to remove the non-assembly Kinesis artifact too, as well as the
> Ganglia one. This doesn't mean it goes away from the project, just
> means it would no longer be published as a Maven artifact. (These have
> never been bundled in the main Spark artifacts.)
>
> I wanted to give a heads up to see if anyone a) believes this
> conclusion is wrong or b) wants to take it up with legal@? I'm
> inclined to believe we have to remove them given the interpretation
> Luciano has put forth.
>
> Sean
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to