+1 I don't believe there's any reason for the warnings to still be there
except for available dev time & focus :)

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 21:35, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl> wrote:

> Kill 'em all -- one by one slowly yet gradually! :)
>
> Pozdrawiam,
> Jacek Laskowski
> ----
> https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/
> Mastering Apache Spark http://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark
> Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca>
> wrote:
> > Now that the 2.0 release is out the door and I've got some cycles to do
> some
> > cleanups -  I'd like to know what other people think of the internal
> > deprecation warnings we've introduced in a lot of a places in our code.
> Once
> > before I did some minor refactoring so the Python code which had to use
> the
> > deprecated code to expose the deprecated API wouldn't gum up the build
> logs
> > - but is there interest in doing that or are we more interested in not
> > paying attention to the deprecation warnings for internal Spark
> components
> > (e.g. https://twitter.com/thepracticaldev/status/725769766603001856 )?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cell : 425-233-8271
> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to