+1 I don't believe there's any reason for the warnings to still be there except for available dev time & focus :)
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 21:35, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl> wrote: > Kill 'em all -- one by one slowly yet gradually! :) > > Pozdrawiam, > Jacek Laskowski > ---- > https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/ > Mastering Apache Spark http://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark > Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> > wrote: > > Now that the 2.0 release is out the door and I've got some cycles to do > some > > cleanups - I'd like to know what other people think of the internal > > deprecation warnings we've introduced in a lot of a places in our code. > Once > > before I did some minor refactoring so the Python code which had to use > the > > deprecated code to expose the deprecated API wouldn't gum up the build > logs > > - but is there interest in doing that or are we more interested in not > > paying attention to the deprecation warnings for internal Spark > components > > (e.g. https://twitter.com/thepracticaldev/status/725769766603001856 )? > > > > > > -- > > Cell : 425-233-8271 > > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >