Oh nevermind, just noticed your note. Apologies. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:20 PM Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just curious: Did we have an RC3? I don't remember seeing one. > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:00 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version >> 2.0.0. The vote is open until Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 12:00 PDT and passes >> if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> >> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.0-rc4 >> (e5f8c1117e0c48499f54d62b556bc693435afae0). >> >> This release candidate resolves ~2500 issues: >> https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.0-jira >> >> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.0-rc4-bin/ >> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc >> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1192/ >> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1192/>* >> >> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.0-rc4-docs/ >> >> >> ================================= >> How can I help test this release? >> ================================= >> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an >> existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then >> reporting any regressions from 1.x. >> >> ========================================== >> What justifies a -1 vote for this release? >> ========================================== >> Critical bugs impacting major functionalities. >> >> Bugs already present in 1.x, missing features, or bugs related to new >> features will not necessarily block this release. Note that historically >> Spark documentation has been published on the website separately from the >> main release so we do not need to block the release due to documentation >> errors either. >> >> >> Note: There was a mistake made during "rc3" preparation, and as a result >> there is no "rc3", but only "rc4". >> >>
