There is a JIRA and PR around for supporting polynomial expansion with
degree 1. Offhand I can't recall if it's been merged
On Mon, 2 May 2016 at 17:45, Julio Antonio Soto de Vicente <ju...@esbet.es>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Same goes for the PolynomialExpansion in org.apache.spark.ml.feature. It
> would be dice to cross-validate with degree 1 polynomial expansion (this
> is, with no expansion at all) vs other degree polynomial expansions.
> Unfortunately, degree is forced to be >= 2.
>
> --
> Julio
>
> > El 2 may 2016, a las 9:05, Rahul Tanwani <tanwanira...@gmail.com>
> escribió:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In certain cases (mostly due to time constraints), we need some model to
> run
> > without cross validation. In such a case, since k-fold value for cross
> > validator cannot be one, we have to maintain two different code paths to
> > achieve both the scenarios (with and without cross validation).
> >
> > Would it be an okay idea to generalize the cross validator so it can work
> > with k-fold value of 1? The only purpose for this is to avoid maintaining
> > two different code paths and in functionality it should be similar to as
> if
> > the cross validation is not present.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Cross-Validator-to-work-with-K-Fold-value-of-1-tp17404.html
> > Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to