You can, but since it's going to be a maintainability issue I would
argue it is in fact a problem.

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi Jakob,
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote:
>> Reynold's 3rd point is particularly strong in my opinion. Supporting
>> Consider what would happen if Spark 2.0 doesn't require Java 8 and
>> hence not support Scala 2.12. Will it be stuck on an older version
>> until 3.0 is out?
>
> That's a false choice. You can support 2.10 (or 2.11) on Java 7 and
> 2.12 on Java 8.
>
> I'm not saying it's a great idea, just that what you're suggesting
> isn't really a problem.
>
> --
> Marcelo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to