You can, but since it's going to be a maintainability issue I would argue it is in fact a problem.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hi Jakob, > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote: >> Reynold's 3rd point is particularly strong in my opinion. Supporting >> Consider what would happen if Spark 2.0 doesn't require Java 8 and >> hence not support Scala 2.12. Will it be stuck on an older version >> until 3.0 is out? > > That's a false choice. You can support 2.10 (or 2.11) on Java 7 and > 2.12 on Java 8. > > I'm not saying it's a great idea, just that what you're suggesting > isn't really a problem. > > -- > Marcelo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org