Work underway at ... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10833 https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8919
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Update: I *think* the conclusion was indeed that nothing needs to > happen with NOTICE. > However, along the way in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-226 it emerged that the > BSD/MIT licenses should be inlined into LICENSE (or copied in the > distro somewhere). I can get on that -- just some grunt work to copy > and paste it all. > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: >> Richard, >> >> Thanks for bringing this up and this is a great point. Let's start another >> thread for it so we don't hijack the release thread. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Richard Hillegas <rhil...@us.ibm.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Under your guidance, I would be happy to help compile a NOTICE file >>> > which >>> > follows the pattern used by Derby and the JDK. This effort might proceed >>> > in >>> > parallel with vetting 1.5.1 and could be targeted at a later release >>> > vehicle. I don't think that the ASF's exposure is greatly increased by >>> > one >>> > more release which follows the old pattern. >>> >>> I'd prefer to use the ASF's preferred pattern, no? That's what we've >>> been trying to do and seems like we're even required to do so, not >>> follow a different convention. There is some specific guidance there >>> about what to add, and not add, to these files. Specifically, because >>> the AL2 requires downstream projects to embed the contents of NOTICE, >>> the guidance is to only include elements in NOTICE that must appear >>> there. >>> >>> Put it this way -- what would you like to change specifically? (you >>> can start another thread for that) >>> >>> >> My assessment (just looked before I saw Sean's email) is the same as >>> >> his. The NOTICE file embeds other projects' licenses. >>> > >>> > This may be where our perspectives diverge. I did not find those >>> > licenses >>> > embedded in the NOTICE file. As I see it, the licenses are cited but not >>> > included. >>> >>> Pretty sure that was meant to say that NOTICE embeds other projects' >>> "notices", not licenses. And those notices can have all kinds of >>> stuff, including licenses. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
