What about this straw man proposal: deprecate in 1.3 with some kind of
message in the build, and remove for 1.4? And add a pointer to any
third-party packaging that might provide similar functionality?

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Nicholas Chammas
<nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to an "official" deprecation + redirecting users to some other project
> that will or already is taking this on.
>
> Nate?
>
>
>
> On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 10:08:27 AM Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I have wondered whether we should sort of deprecated it more
>> officially, since otherwise I think people have the reasonable
>> expectation based on the current code that Spark intends to support
>> "complete" Debian packaging as part of the upstream build. Having
>> something that's sort-of maintained but no one is helping review and
>> merge patches on it or make it fully functional, IMO that doesn't
>> benefit us or our users. There are a bunch of other projects that are
>> specifically devoted to packaging, so it seems like there is a clear
>> separation of concerns here.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Mark Hamstra <m...@clearstorydata.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> it sounds like nobody intends these to be used to actually deploy Spark
>> >
>> >
>> > I wouldn't go quite that far.  What we have now can serve as useful
>> > input
>> > to a deployment tool like Chef, but the user is then going to need to
>> > add
>> > some customization or configuration within the context of that tooling
>> > to
>> > get Spark installed just the way they want.  So it is not so much that
>> > the
>> > current Debian packaging can't be used as that it has never really been
>> > intended to be a completely finished product that a newcomer could, for
>> > example, use to install Spark completely and quickly to Ubuntu and have
>> > a
>> > fully-functional environment in which they could then run all of the
>> > examples, tutorials, etc.
>> >
>> > Getting to that level of packaging (and maintenance) is something that
>> > I'm
>> > not sure we want to do since that is a better fit with Bigtop and the
>> > efforts of Cloudera, Horton Works, MapR, etc. to distribute Spark.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is a straw poll to assess whether there is support to keep and
>> >> fix, or remove, the Debian packaging-related config in Spark.
>> >>
>> >> I see several oldish outstanding JIRAs relating to problems in the
>> >> packaging:
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1799
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2614
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3624
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4436
>> >> (and a similar idea about making RPMs)
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-665
>> >>
>> >> The original motivation seems related to Chef:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2614?focusedCommentId=14070908&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14070908
>> >>
>> >> Mark's recent comments cast some doubt on whether it is essential:
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4277#issuecomment-72114226
>> >>
>> >> and in recent conversations I didn't hear dissent to the idea of
>> >> removing
>> >> this.
>> >>
>> >> Is this still useful enough to fix up? All else equal I'd like to
>> >> start to walk back some of the complexity of the build, but I don't
>> >> know how all-else-equal it is. Certainly, it sounds like nobody
>> >> intends these to be used to actually deploy Spark.
>> >>
>> >> I don't doubt it's useful to someone, but can they maintain the
>> >> packaging logic elsewhere?
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to