BTW, this PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2524 is related to a blocker level bug,
and this is actually close to be merged (have been reviewed for several rounds) I would appreciated if anyone can continue the process, @mateiz -- Nan Zhu http://codingcat.me On Thursday, November 20, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Corey Nolet wrote: > I was actually about to post this myself- I have a complex join that could > benefit from something like a GroupComparator vs having to do multiple > grouyBy operations. This is probably the wrong thread for a full discussion > on this but I didn't see a JIRA ticket for this or anything similar- any > reasons why this would not make sense given Spark's design? > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Madhu <ma...@madhu.com > (mailto:ma...@madhu.com)> wrote: > > > Thanks Patrick. > > > > I've been testing some 1.2 features, looks good so far. > > I have some example code that I think will be helpful for certain MR-style > > use cases (secondary sort). > > Can I still add that to the 1.2 documentation, or is that frozen at this > > point? > > > > > > > > ----- > > -- > > Madhu > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/msiddalingaiah > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-Spark-1-2-0-Release-Preview-Posted-tp9400p9449.html > > Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at > > Nabble.com (http://Nabble.com). > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > > (mailto:dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org) > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > > (mailto:dev-h...@spark.apache.org) > > > > > >
