Hi Bertrand,

> On 28 Jan 2020, at 17:20, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:54 PM Bertrand Delacretaz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ...For SLING-8110 I'd like to take into account the
>> sling.servlet.extensions and sling.servlet.methods properties...
> ...
>> To keep backwards compatibility, I suggest adding a new optional
>> sling.servlet.resolution property that for now can have the value
>> "strict".
> 
> I'm (at last) implementing this. Carsten observed in this thread that
> the meaning of "strict" is not really obvious here so I suggest
> instead:
> 
>  sling.servlet.extpaths = true
> 

What about “sling.servlet.paths.strict”? A value of false (default) keeps the 
previous behaviour. A value of true means that the other registration 
properties (extensions, methods, selectors?!) will be taken into consideration.

Thanks,
Radu

Reply via email to