Yi,

I think I am getting ahead of myself.  We are not getting past the job 
coordinator portion of the config.  Running 1.3 and defining 
job.coordinator.factory=org.apache.samza.standalone.PassthroughJobCoordinatorFactory
 in the properties file we still get the error below.


Exception in thread "main" org.apache.samza.config.ConfigException: Missing key 
job.coordinator.zk.connect.
        at org.apache.samza.config.Config.getList(Config.java:168)
        at com.helixeducation.porter.HelixApp.<init>(HelixApp.java:29)
        at 
com.helixeducation.porter.HelixRocksDBApp.<init>(HelixRocksDBApp.java:16)
        at 
com.helixeducation.porter.inquirySubmission.InquirySubmissionApp.<init>(InquirySubmissionApp.java:25)
        at 
com.helixeducation.porter.inquirySubmission.InquirySubmissionTaskRunner.main(InquirySubmissionTaskRunner.java:19)

On 2/5/20, 6:32 PM, "Yi Pan" <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi, Robert,
    
    Thanks! I believe since Samza 1.2, the ZK dependency from Kafka consumer is
    removed from Samza. I briefly checked the code base from master and there
    is no reference to KafkaConsumerConfig.getZkConnect(). Do you see any error
    messages when you remove the systems.x.consumer.zookeeper.connect from your
    config?
    
    -Yi
    
    On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:12 PM Robert Wigginton
    <rwiggin...@helixeducation.com.invalid> wrote:
    
    > Currently 1.0.0 but are in the process of upgrading to 1.3.0.
    >
    > On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 15:01 -0800, Yi Pan wrote:
    > > Hi, Robert,
    > >
    > > Which version of Samza are you using?
    > >
    > > -Yi
    > >
    > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:17 AM Robert Wigginton
    > > <rwiggin...@helixeducation.com.invalid> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Hello,
    > > >
    > > > We are currently evaluating moving from an on prem Kafka deployment
    > > > to
    > > > Confluent Cloud.  Confluent Cloud does not expose Zookeeper to
    > > > user.
    > > > Is it possible to setup a Samza consumer without the zookeeper
    > > > connect
    > > > option?
    > > >
    > > > Thanks,
    > > >
    > > > Robert
    > > >
    >
    

Reply via email to