Very much in favour of the proposed SEP process -- strong +1 from me. -----Original Message----- From: Navina Ramesh (Apache) [mailto:nav...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 10:16 PM To: dev@samza.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] SAMZA-1141 - Apache Samza Development Process Improvements
Hi everyone, We switched to using Pull Requests for code reviews a few months back. Clearly, there are some drawbacks to that model and we are trying to address the shortcomings. I have gathered input from some of the committers regarding what is missing the code review process and what can be improved. Please take a look and provide feedback. Additionally, we are considering moving to a KIP/FLIP-like model for submitting design proposals (major changes to samza). Lately, there have been some major feature discussions that are not documented consistently in a centralized location. The proposal in SAMZA-1141 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-1141> address the design review process as well. Please review it too. I have already created a wiki page <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SAMZA/Samza+Enhancement+Proposal> describing the Samza Enhancement Proposal (SEP) process and an SEP template. Going forward, let's start adding all major change proposals to the wiki and discuss the design on the mailing list. Your cooperation is highly appreciated during this period of transition in the process :) Feedbacks welcome! Thanks! -- Navina R PS: Alternatives name suggestions for "SEP" are welcome ! ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4756/14112 - Release Date: 03/13/17
