> On Sept. 29, 2016, 2:30 p.m., Prateek Maheshwari wrote: > > samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/system/kafka/KafkaSystemProducer.scala, > > line 220 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/52403/diff/2/?file=1516385#file1516385line220> > > > > If the intention is to allow user to ensure that the container doesn't > > die on producer failures, shouldn't this not throw either? If we end up > > flushing right after the callback exception, the user will not get a chance > > to ignore the exception.
Someone ran into this issue today. - Prateek ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52403/#review150947 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 29, 2016, 2:23 p.m., Xinyu Liu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/52403/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 29, 2016, 2:23 p.m.) > > > Review request for samza, Navina Ramesh and Jagadish Venkatraman. > > > Repository: samza > > > Description > ------- > > Current the error log happens after produce close and reset the exception in > later callbacks, which caused the trouble shooting to be harder in cases of > multithreading. We should log error before closing and keep atomic reference > of the initial exception. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > samza-kafka/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/system/kafka/KafkaSystemProducer.scala > 5ff6d3caf54ed148aa40c7c752c587e556a4f34a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52403/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested in jobs deployed in Yarn cluster. > > > Thanks, > > Xinyu Liu > >
