-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/47992/#review144836
-----------------------------------------------------------



Closing the loop:
This review has been superseded by https://reviews.apache.org/r/50583/ and can 
be discarded.

- Jake Maes


On July 20, 2016, 6:01 p.m., Jagadish Venkatraman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/47992/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 20, 2016, 6:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for samza, Navina Ramesh and Yi Pan (Data Infrastructure).
> 
> 
> Repository: samza
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Often Samza jobs keep running for days (and in our case months). Log messages 
> generated by the job get rolled over. A lot of information that is critical 
> for debugging a job (like the jmx server port, URL, job model for the current 
> container, configuration that was passed to the container) is often printed 
> when the job starts. However, since logs get rolled over (by Yarn/ by 
> sys-administrators) when they exceed a certain size, this information is not 
> obvious. This RB adds a startup logger to the Logging trait.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/container/SamzaContainer.scala 
> cf3c4c0ab08a59760bc899c6f2027755e933b350 
>   samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/metrics/JmxServer.scala 
> ad00ca00f918df4d71d1c920b77027401a55c80b 
>   samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/util/Logging.scala 
> 250de1e2fa103be1a426d9da31187c12dbff8678 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/47992/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> <logger name="STARTUP" additivity="false">
> <priority value="info" />
> <appender-ref ref="startup_file_appender"/>
> </logger>
> 
> Verified log messages are correctly appended in both main, and startup logs.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jagadish Venkatraman
> 
>

Reply via email to