Yarn 2.4 lacks from useful rest api as well. I prefer 2.6 as well. +1 ! On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 on my end > > On Monday, August 17, 2015, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, Yan, > > > > Thanks for rolling the ball! > > > > +1 from me to upgrade the minimum supported version to YARN 2.6, assuming > > that we are going to fix SAMZA-750 together. > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > we have been discussing upgrading to Yarn 2.6.0 (SAMZA-536 > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-536>), because there are > > some > > > bug fixes after 2.4.0 and we can not enable the Yarn RM recovering > > feature > > > in Yarn 2.4.0 (SAMZA-750 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-750 > > > >) > > > . > > > > > > So we just want to make sure if any production users are still using > Yarn > > > 2.4.0 and do not plan to upgrade to 2.6.0+? > > > > > > If not further concern, I think we can go and upgrade to Yarn 2.6.0 in > > > Samza 0.10.0 release. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Fang, Yan > > > yanfang...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > > > > > > -- Navina R.
