As discussed, this vote has been CANCELED.
On 25 June 2015 at 16:34, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote: > no objection from me. :) > > Thanks, > > Fang, Yan > yanfang...@gmail.com > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, all, >> >> I have been preparing for the new 0.9.1 RC1 and it is close to be done. I >> am going to cancel this VOTE, if no objections. >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Yi, >> > >> > This only publishes the artifacts to the staging repository for testing. >> > After completing the vote, you can "release" the artifacts to the public >> > repository by clicking the "release" button. :) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Fang, Yan >> > yanfang...@gmail.com >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, Yan, >> > > >> > > Thanks for point out that! Actually I saw that last time and had the >> > > following question: should we publish the artifacts after the VOTE is >> > > completed or together w/ the VOTE? >> > > It seems like that we want to publish the binary artifacts together w/ >> > the >> > > VOTE, right? >> > > >> > > -Yi >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Yi Pan, >> > > > >> > > > " Is there any document regarding to how to publish the maven staging >> > > link? >> > > > " >> > > > >> > > > -- Yes. Check the last part of the >> > > > https://github.com/apache/samza/blob/master/RELEASE.md . Not sure if >> > you >> > > > have seen this. I should have pointed it out earlier. *_* >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > >> > > > Fang, Yan >> > > > yanfang...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi, guys, >> > > > > >> > > > > I am working on the list of things posted by Yan: >> > > > > >> > > > > 1. I have the difficulty in building the 0.9.1 branch. I think this >> > is >> > > > > mainly related to SAMZA-721 >> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-721>. >> > > > > >> > > > > This seems to be an invalid case in 0.9.1. We only need the >> > > > > joint-compilation option in master. >> > > > > >> > > > > 2. Also, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-712 seems >> > > bothering >> > > > > people as well. >> > > > > >> > > > > Committed to master and backported to 0.9.1. >> > > > > >> > > > > 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-720 is a critical >> bug >> > > we >> > > > > need to fix. Have already attached a patch. >> > > > > >> > > > > Plan to backport to 0.9.1. >> > > > > >> > > > > 4. There is no maven staging link. >> > > > > >> > > > > Is there any document regarding to how to publish the maven staging >> > > link? >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Naveen Somasundaram < >> > > > > nsomasunda...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hey Yan, >> > > > > > SAMZA-721 might be because you checkout master and >> > > > > switched >> > > > > > to 0.9.1 branch, and you still have some files from master which >> > git >> > > is >> > > > > not >> > > > > > tracking. Can you try a git clean before you build 0.9.1 ? AFAIK >> > you >> > > > > don't >> > > > > > need joint compilation for core in 0.9.1. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Roger Hoover < >> > > roger.hoo...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yan, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I tested to patch locally and it looks good. Creating a >> patched >> > > > > release >> > > > > > > for myself to test in our environment. Thanks, again. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:59 AM, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi, Yan, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the quick fix on the mentioned bugs. It >> seems >> > > the >> > > > > fix >> > > > > > > for >> > > > > > > > SAMZA-720 is pretty localized and I am OK to push it into >> > 0.9.1. >> > > I >> > > > > will >> > > > > > > be >> > > > > > > > working on back porting those changes to 0.9.1 later today >> and >> > > fix >> > > > > all >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > release related issues. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks! >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -Yi >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Roger Hoover < >> > > > > roger.hoo...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Yan, >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> You rock. Thank you so much for the quick fix. I'm working >> > on >> > > > > > building >> > > > > > > >> and testing the patch. >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Cheers, >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> Roger >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Yan Fang < >> > > yanfang...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> Hi guys, >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> 1. I have the difficulty in building the 0.9.1 branch. I >> > think >> > > > this >> > > > > > is >> > > > > > > >>> mainly related to SAMZA-721 >> > > > > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-721>. >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> 2. Also, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-712 >> > seems >> > > > > > > bothering >> > > > > > > >>> people as well. >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-720 is a >> > > critical >> > > > > bug >> > > > > > > we >> > > > > > > >>> need to fix. Have already attached a patch. >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> 4. There is no maven staging link. >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> Fang, Yan >> > > > > > > >>> yanfang...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Roger Hoover < >> > > > > > roger.hoo...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Hi all, >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Do you think we could get this bootstrapping bug fixed >> > before >> > > > > 0.9.1 >> > > > > > > >>>> release? It seems like a critical bug. >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-720 >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> Roger >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Yan Fang < >> > > > yanfang...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Agree. I will test it this weekend. >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Thanks, >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>> Fang, Yan >> > > > > > > >>>>> yanfang...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Guozhang Wang < >> > > > > > wangg...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> Since we only get one vote so far, I think I have to >> > extend >> > > > the >> > > > > > > >> vote >> > > > > > > >>>>>> deadline. Let's set it to next Monday 6pm. >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> Please check the candidate and vote for your opinions. >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> Guozhang >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Yi Pan < >> > > nickpa...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> +1. Ran the Samza failure test suite and succeeded over >> > > > night. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Guozhang Wang < >> > > > > > > >> wangg...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hey all, >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza >> > > > 0.9.1. >> > > > > > > >>> This >> > > > > > > >>>>> is a >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> bug-fix release against 0.9.0. >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The release candidate can be downloaded from here: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~guozhang/samza-0.9.1-rc0/ >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The release candidate is signed with pgp key 911402D8, >> > > which >> > > > > is >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> included in the repository's KEYS file: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=samza.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=6f5bafb6cd93934781161eb6b1868d11ea347c95 >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and can also be found on keyservers: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x911402D8 >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The git tag is release-0.9.1-rc0 and signed with the >> > same >> > > > pgp >> > > > > > > >>> key: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=samza.git;a=tag;h=e78b9e7f34650538b4bb68b338eb472b98a5709e >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Test binaries have been published to Maven's staging >> > > > > > > >> repository, >> > > > > > > >>>> and >> > > > > > > >>>>>> are >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> available here: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> 5 critical bugs were resolved for this release: >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-715?jql=project%20%3D%20SAMZA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.1%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29 >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours ( end in 6:00pm >> > > Saturday, >> > > > > > > >>>>> 06/20/2015 >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> ). >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Please download the release candidate, check the >> > > > > > > >>> hashes/signature, >> > > > > > > >>>>>> build >> > > > > > > >>>>>>> it >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> and test it, and then please vote: >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> -- Guozhang >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > > >>>>>> -- >> > > > > > > >>>>>> -- Guozhang >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
