If the rule does not change, we can get the rule when starting up
StreamTasks and then localize it.

Cheers,

Fang, Yan
yanfang...@gmail.com

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote:

> "If I understand it correctly the only viable solution at the moment is to
> create a new stream for the  rules messages with as many partitions as the
> data stream and write each rules update message to all partitions of the
> new rules stream."
>
> If the data is constantly changing, yes, AFAIK, this is the only viable
> solution before we provide "shared store".
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fang, Yan
> yanfang...@gmail.com
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Ueli Gallizzi <ueli.galli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yan,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick response.
>>
>> After I read the discussion on SAMZA-353 I think the best solution for my
>> use case is a "shared state" store among StreamTasks described in
>> SAMZA-402. To give you some background I have a stream with rules which
>> are
>> constantly changing and a data stream on which I apply the rules. The
>> rules
>> set is very small if you compare it with the data stream.
>>
>> If I understand it correctly the only viable solution at the moment is to
>> create a new stream for the  rules messages with as many partitions as the
>> data stream and write each rules update message to all partitions of the
>> new rules stream.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - ueli
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Yan Fang <yanfang...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Ueli,
>> >
>> > This feature currently is not supported by Samza. There was some
>> > discussions in the JIRA - SAMZA-353
>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-353>.
>> >
>> > But there are some workaround for this, depends on what you want to
>> > achieve. If you can specify what your requirement is, we can help think
>> of
>> > the solution.
>> >
>> > In another thread
>> > <
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/samza-dev/201504.mbox/%3c552410e2.7000...@tivo.com%3E
>> > >,
>> > Tommy Becker has similar requirement and he maybe helpful as well.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Fang, Yan
>> > yanfang...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Ueli Gallizzi <ueli.galli...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Is it possible that multiple tasks read from the same input stream
>> > > partition?
>> > >
>> > > example:
>> > > task 0 stream A partition 0, stream B partition 0
>> > > task 1 stream A partition 1, stream B partition 0
>> > > task 2 stream A partition 3, stream B partition 0
>> > >
>> > > In this example all messages in stream B partition 0 would be
>> processed
>> > by
>> > > all 3 tasks.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > - ueli
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to