Perfect Chris. We will test out the latest version. Did not get a chance to
test it.
On the same note, as I have not caught up with 0.9.0, is there anyway to
get the feature list or some release notes for 0.9.0. I am interested with
the windowing and SQL like capabilities.

- Shekar

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hey Shekar,
>
> Are you running with 0.8.0 when you run these tests? If so, there are some
> known issues where a Samza consumer can get stuck when brokers disappeared.
> All known issues have been resolved in the 0.9.0 release, but they exist in
> the 0.8.0 release.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Shekar Tippur <ctip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > One more thing ..
> >
> > We have this configured as well.
> >
> >
> >
> systems.kafka.producer.metadata.broker.list=sprfargas102:6667,sprfargas103:6667
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Shekar Tippur <ctip...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I realise this is a Kafka question. Since there are quite a few Kafka
> > > experts here and the answer to this question can help Samza community
> as
> > > well, bringing this question here.
> > >
> > > We are testing Kafka redundancy (just 2 brokers for now).
> > >
> > > We have increased replication factor to 2 servers (Both kafka brokers)
> > > We have included auto.leader.rebalance.enable=true so that the leader
> > gets
> > > redundancy and bounced Kafka.
> > > We have moved the topic across both the servers.
> > >
> > > Below table shows the sequence of events. Can someone please explain
> why
> > > we see this behaviour in step 4?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Broker 1
> > >
> > > Broker 2
> > >
> > > Kafka status
> > >
> > > Step 1
> > >
> > > Up
> > >
> > > Up
> > >
> > > Running
> > >
> > > Step 2
> > >
> > > Down
> > >
> > > Up
> > >
> > > Running
> > >
> > > Step 3
> > >
> > > Up
> > >
> > > Up
> > >
> > > Running
> > >
> > > Step 4
> > >
> > > Up
> > >
> > > Down
> > >
> > > Not running (Connection refused)
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to