-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31881/#review75881
-----------------------------------------------------------


Seems like it should work. Could you write a test to verify? I know it's a 
little hard with shutdown hooks (or anything that interacts with System/Runtime 
Java stuff), but I can't actually prove to myself that this works without a 
test.


samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/container/RunLoop.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31881/#comment123203>

    Nit: move outside of run. Optionally, make shutdownHook injectible via 
constructor for testing purposes.



samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/container/RunLoop.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31881/#comment123201>

    I think shutdownHook needs to be made volatile. The hook will be executed 
from another thread than the RunLoop, which is reading the variable.


- Chris Riccomini


On March 10, 2015, 6:55 a.m., Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31881/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 10, 2015, 6:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for samza.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SAMZA-506
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMZA-506
> 
> 
> Repository: samza
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Shutdown RunLoop on SIGTERM.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   samza-core/src/main/scala/org/apache/samza/container/RunLoop.scala 499f5c6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31881/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Passes unit and zopkio tests.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> 
>

Reply via email to