I’d just create my own ItemRenderer with the custom label behavior.
I have MANY custom renderers in my apps.
> On Jun 8, 2022, at 12:16 AM, Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I use itemRenders for more visual complex things (images, text with bold,
> etc ...)
> On this case I have a generic itemRender (visual aspect) and what's
> different it's the content.
> Doing an itemRender for each ComboBox seems to much work and a simple
> formula it's something in between for a less complex code structure.
>
> But I understand what you mean, that's why I asked in the first place
> before commit.
>
> So, what's the best option to have this implemented only on my side (if
> there is this option) ?
> I would like to have this behaviour without put on the SDK and without
> using itemRenderers.
> For another word, how to have a copy of the custom getLabelFromData and use
> this instead of the SDK ?
>
>
> Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia terça, 7/06/2022 à(s) 22:04:
>
>> Hard coding it into a function which is widely used by ItemRenderers does
>> not seem like a good idea or very PAYG.
>>
>> Id suggest creating ItemRenderers which have this behavior.
>>
>> If there’s some way to inject the behavior into existing functions that
>> would be fine too, but I can’t think off hand of a good way of doing that.
>>
>>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:48 PM, Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Method getLabelFromData from getLabelFromData.as
>>>
>>> I just added a new if block that seek for "[" and thread the keys.
>>> If it's OK, I can commit, otherwise I ask what's the best alternative
>>> solution to achive the same result.
>>>
>>> public function getLabelFromData(obj:Object,data:Object):String
>>> {
>>> // slightly more code, but we bail early if it's a string which is
>>> often
>>> if (data is String) return "" + data;
>>> if(!data) return "";
>>> if(data is ILabeledData) return (data as ILabeledData).label;
>>>
>>> if (obj is IHasLabelField &&
>>> (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField &&
>>> (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField.indexOf("[") > -1)
>>> {
>>> var result:String = (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField;
>>> for each (var item:String in result.split("["))
>>> {
>>> if (item.indexOf("]") > -1)
>>> {
>>> var field:String = item.split("]")[0];
>>> result = result.replace("[" + field + "]",
>> data[field]);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> return result;
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (obj is IHasLabelField &&
>>> (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField &&
>>> data[(obj as IHasLabelField).labelField] != null)
>>> {
>>> return "" + data[(obj as IHasLabelField).labelField];
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (obj is IHasDataField &&
>>> (obj as IHasDataField).dataField &&
>>> data[(obj as IHasDataField).dataField] != null)
>>> {
>>> return "" + data[(obj as IHasDataField).dataField];
>>> }
>>>
>>> var label:String = data["label"];
>>> if(label != null){
>>> return label;
>>> }
>>> return "" + data;
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> escreveu no dia terça, 7/06/2022
>> à(s)
>>> 21:44:
>>>
>>>> Hugo, could it be seen? Maybe a branch or a PR?
>>>>
>>>> Hiedra
>>>>
>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>>> De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
>>>> Enviado el: martes, 7 de junio de 2022 21:58
>>>> Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
>>>> Asunto: Proposal for labelField with expression support
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In Flex "world" one can use labelField and labelFunction.
>>>> Here in Royale we have only labelField (at least I didn't see so far
>>>> support for labelFunction), however I'm not a big fan of labelFunction
>>>> anyway.
>>>>
>>>> I always wanted support for something in between of labelField and
>>>> labelFunction (labelFunction with multiple fields and fixed strings)
>> and I
>>>> implement it on my side.
>>>>
>>>> Ex:
>>>> model:
>>>> public class User
>>>> {
>>>> public var Code:String;
>>>> public var Name:String;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> With this model, one can use Code (user code) or Name but not the
>> combined
>>>> fields.
>>>>
>>>> With a little adition I can now do something like this:
>> labelField="[Code]
>>>> - [Name]" and at runtime every field delimited by [] it's replaced for
>> his
>>>> value, allowing multiple fields and complex expressions.
>>>>
>>>> Can I commit this or there is a reason to not do so ?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Hugo.
>>>>
>>
>>
