For:
modelType="{TestGridModel}"
it is not 'modelType' that needs to be [Bindable] in this case as it is the
destination of the binding, not the source of it.
Assuming other bindings are working in the enclosing mxml file (which
should be true with ContainerDataBinding), then perhaps there is an issue
with the 'const'-like assignment of a class directly in this case. You
could perhaps try doing something like this:
public class TestConfig {
public static const gridModel:Class = TestGridModel;
}
and
modelType="{ TestConfig.gridModel }"
to see if that works. If changing it like that does work, then please log a
bug for the original version of this that is not working,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:09 PM Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following mxml code:
>
> <dg:DataGrid localId="grid"
> dataProvider="{data}"
> width="100%"
> height="200">
> <dg:beads>
> <beads:DataGridOptions modelType="{TestGridModel}"/>
> </dg:beads>
> ...
>
> The DataGridOptions bead it's a bead to dynamically add buttons on the
> Jewel DataGrid footer.
> This bead have a property called modelType:Class and the data binding is
> not working (the property is always null)
>
> I have the ContainerDataBinding set on the main mxml file.
> I also tried to decorate the modelType property with [Bindable]
>
> Do I missing a special DataBinding bead for this ?
>
