+1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.9-src.zip Java 1.8 OS: Windows 10 amd64 10.0 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unapproved binaries: y
Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf.zip Binary kit signatures match: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y No unapproved binaries in binary package: y REVIEW NOTES: Approving as-is, although I do have some comments that I will add to the discussion thread relating to future improvements in README and to my 'test' which was simply to check both the ant and maven build of TourDeJewel. On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 11:16 PM Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Package > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.9-src.tar.gz > > Java 9 > > OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.16 > > Source kit signatures match: y > > Source kit builds: y > > README is ok: y > > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > > NOTICE is ok: y > > LICENSE is ok: y > > No unapproved licenses or archives: y > > No unapproved binaries: y > > > Package > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf.tar.gz > > Binary kit signatures match: y > > NOTICE is ok: y > > LICENSE is ok: y > > No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y > > No unapproved binaries in binary package: y > > I have used Maven artifacts to build and run bigger Jewel based application > - everything went fine. > > czw., 17 mar 2022 o 23:15 Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > napisał(a): > > > +1 > > Package > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/apache-royale-0.9.9-src.tar.gz > > Java 17 > > OS: Mac OS X aarch64 12.1 > > Source kit signatures match: y > > Source kit builds: y > > README is ok: y > > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > > NOTICE is ok: y > > LICENSE is ok: y > > No unapproved licenses or archives: y > > No unapproved binaries: y > > > > Package > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf.tar.gz > > Binary kit signatures match: y > > NOTICE is ok: y > > LICENSE is ok: y > > No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y > > No unapproved binaries in binary package: y > > > > -- > > Josh Tynjala > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:42 AM <apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > This is the vote for the 0.9.9 release of Apache Royale. The release > > > candidate can be found here; > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/ > > > > > > Before voting please review the section,'What are the ASF requirements > on > > > approving a release?', at: > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > > > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that: > > > - SHA and signed packages are correct > > > - README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine > > > - That the build script completes successfully > > > - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK. > > > > > > The KEYS file is at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/royale/KEYS > > > > > > The source package is a combination of the 3 main Royale repos. > > > > > > To use the binary package, unzip it into a folder. The -js package is > > > ready-to-use in an IDE or command-line. If you need SWF output, use the > > > -js-swf package and use Apache Ant to run the InstallAdobeSDKs script > > via: > > > ant -f InstallAdobeSDKs.xml > > > > > > You may also get the binarypackages via NPM. The -js package can be > > > installed via: > > > npm install > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js.tar.gz > > > > > > The full package with SWF support can be installed via: > > > > > > npm install > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.9-bin-js-swf.tar.gz > > > > > > Maven artifacts are staged here: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheroyale-1091 > > > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > +1 Approve the release > > > -1 Disapprove the release (please provide specific comments to why) > > > > > > This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called. > > > > > > The vote passes if there is: > > > - At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC > > > - More positive votes than negative votes > > > > > > Remember that this is a 'beta-quality' release so expect there will be > > > many bugs found. IMO the goal is not to try to find and fix bugs in the > > RC, > > > but to make sure we have the packaging right, and enough functionality > > that > > > folks will have some success trying to use it. People who are not in > PMC > > > are also encouraged to test out the release and vote, although their > > votes > > > will not be binding, they can influence how the PMC votes. > > > > > > When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR > > > version you tested with. > > > > > > For your convenience, there is an ant script that automates the common > > > steps to validate a release. Instead of individually downloading the > > > package and signature files, unzipping, etc, you can instead: > > > 1) create an empty folder, > > > 2) download into that folder this file: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.9/rc4/ApproveRoyale.xml > > > 3) run the script: > > > ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.9 -Drc=4 > > > If you want to test SWF support during the approval, use: > > > ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.9 -Drc=4 > > > -Duse-flash=true > > > > > > You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the > packages > > > and build results are always encouraged. > > > > > > Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread > not > > > this VOTE thread. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Yishay Weiss > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki >
