gpg2 --keyserver https://pgp.mit.edu/ --search-keys yishayj...@hotmail.com

> On Mar 9, 2022, at 3:18 PM, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> My mistake, it was created on 2021-04-02, so I couldn’t have been published 
> on April 13, 2020.
> 
> How did you determine that it was the most current published key?
> 
> 
> 
> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 3:07 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
> 
> Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until 
> someone else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a 
> problem locally for me and see if I can fix it...
> 
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> No, that’s the one
>> 
>> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
>> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
>> 
>> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most 
>> current published key.
>> 
>> Did you use a newer one?
>> 
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I got an error here:
>>> 
>>> check-sigs:
>>> 
>>> gpg_check:
>>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar  8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>>> gpg:                using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>>> gpg:           w/o user IDs: 1
>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>> 
>>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yishay Weiss
> 

Reply via email to