That's a good observation. Firefox creates a new process for each tab, so multiple open tabs could explain why there are multiple processes.
If I remember correctly, if RoyaleUnit starts when a Firefox window is already open, it should leave the existing window open when tests are done. If Firefox was not started beforehand, it should close the window it opens. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:58 AM Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know how things work on the build server, but when running local > builds, each unit test opens a new browser tab, and at least for me, the > browser is not closed, although this might be because of some difference > with how I have things running locally. Is that the same thing that happens > on the build server? If so, would that not accumulate over time? > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:55 AM Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Ok, just to complete this current effort, can you tell me where > > GeckoDriver is actually called? I want to check if quit() is not being > > called where it should [1]. > > > > [1] 1430064 - Firefox does not exit when geckodriver is terminated ( > > mozilla.org)<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430064> > > > > From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > > Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 8:52 PM > > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #2215 > > > > It could be that these FF jobs add up to something, but I think in the > > past I saw some task that was really using a significant amount of CPU. > It > > would fire up on occasion and then run until we run out of credits. It > did > > not start up right away after re-starting the server. So maybe set a > > reminder to check after a week and two weeks and three weeks and see > there > > are a ton of FF jobs or some other task is burning up CPU. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 12/20/21, 10:46 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > wrote: > > > > As best I can tell, the RoyaleUnit Ant task appears to always destroy > > the > > process it launches (whether it's Firefox/Chrome/Flash Player), even > if > > something goes wrong. There's a try/finally around the code where it > > waits > > for the test results, and the process is destroyed in the finally > > block. So > > even if there's a Java exception in the Ant task while Firefox is > > running, > > that code will run. > > > > We run Firefox for the Selenium/GeckoDriver stuff too, but I would > > expect > > that code would be pretty robust too. I'm less familiar with those > > other > > tests, though. > > > > -- > > Josh Tynjala > > Bowler Hat LLC < > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c16dacf1aad429bb27808d9c3e8ecff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637756228030747252%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Stfk0GHe9jwnKuAYZD0vOhTe80uj51a1Aocx151Bmj8%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:08 AM Yishay Weiss < > yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Sort of related: there are lots of unclosed firefox processes that > I > > think > > > are leftover from unit tests. That could be the reason we > > occasionally run > > > out of memory there. > > > > > > > > > PS C:\Users\ApacheRoyaleCI> ps FireFox > > > > > > Handles NPM(K) PM(K) WS(K) CPU(s) Id SI > ProcessName > > > ------- ------ ----- ----- ------ -- -- > ----------- > > > 318 29 54944 57176 2.36 1324 0 firefox > > > 139 13 18416 13232 0.06 2436 0 firefox > > > 42 5 1104 4152 0.02 3156 0 firefox > > > 304 25 35776 40028 0.75 4428 0 firefox > > > 276 20 25192 28772 0.25 4552 0 firefox > > > 332 26 35200 32672 0.67 4796 0 firefox > > > 996 99 287000 292076 39.92 4856 0 firefox > > > 298 22 27792 24408 0.33 5324 0 firefox > > > 304 25 35956 32004 1.38 5888 0 firefox > > > 273 20 25472 29336 0.13 6052 0 firefox > > > 308 33 96816 116296 3.91 6232 0 firefox > > > 231 15 20760 18620 0.14 6504 0 firefox > > > 1148 103 385840 305744 414.09 6588 0 firefox > > > 294 102 439752 450604 93.88 6592 0 firefox > > > 275 20 25228 29032 0.20 6640 0 firefox > > > 231 15 20844 19116 0.06 6660 0 firefox > > > 276 20 25172 29000 0.20 6712 0 firefox > > > > > > From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > > > Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2021 6:31 PM > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #2215 > > > > > > Jenkins should be back up and running. Volunteers with access to > > this > > > server are welcome to spend some time trying to optimize/eliminate > > some of > > > the background tasks. > > > > > > When we first started running out of credits I noticed that Windows > > seemed > > > to be running some sort of indexer in the background, but didn't > > have time > > > to figure out how to keep it from running (or maybe just run in > > certain > > > folders). IMO, the CPU usage of that indexer sometimes burns our > > Azure > > > credits just fast enough that we run out with about 24 to 48 hours > > before > > > the month ends. > > > > > > And of course, volunteers are welcome to run Jenkins on their own > > > server/accounts that have credit cards to pay for the overage. > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 12/17/21, 12:32 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > > > I just got the email that the Jenkins server ran out of Azure > > credits > > > and will be suspended for a while. Not exactly sure when the new > > credits > > > are released. > > > > > > On 12/16/21, 11:49 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks again Edward, that was certainly much easier than > > last time > > > I set up > > > for this (which was quite some time ago and required > > downgrading > > > to an > > > older version of Firefox etc). > > > > > > However, do you know if it is normal for all tests to pass > > and > > > then see > > > this at the end in js?: > > > > > > [java] RESULT: > > > > > > > > > scriptName=C:\development\asf\royale-asjs/mustella/tests/mxtests/basicTests/spark/scripts/ButtonTestScript.mxml > > > id=SparkButtonTest1 result=pass elapsed=1438 phase=body > > > started=1639727175704 extraInfo= msg= > > > [java] 1639727177157 Marionette INFO > > Stopped > > > listening > > > on port 53835 > > > [java] > > > [java] ###!!! [Child][RunMessage] Error: Channel > > closing: too > > > late to > > > send/recv, messages will be lost > > > [java] > > > [java] > > > [java] ###!!! [Child][MessageChannel::SendAndWait] > > Error: > > > Channel > > > error: cannot send/recv > > > [java] > > > > > > BUILD FAILED > > > C:\development\asf\royale-asjs\build.xml:1577: Java > > returned: 1 > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > Greg > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Greg Dove < > > greg.d...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Edward, I will keep that in mind for the future. > > > Meanwhile I made > > > > changes today that got it to pass. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 4:21 PM Edward Stangler < > > > estang...@bradmark.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> If you have Windows and Firefox installed, then just > > download > > > and > > > >> extract geckodriver-v0.30.0-win64.zip: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmozilla%2Fgeckodriver%2Freleases&data=04%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1c16dacf1aad429bb27808d9c3e8ecff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637756228030747252%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ZxgRnxKZI0cldKjXuGA3fpbQ1tFfYlgeiQp6y%2Bln%2FFI%3D&reserved=0 > > > >> > > > >> and do this (in your build+test environment): > > > >> > > > >> set > > > GECKODRIVER_HOME=c:\geckodriver-v0.30.0-win64\geckodriver.exe > > > >> ant mxtests-run-js > > > >> > > > >> (ant basictest-run-js passes) > > > >> > > > >> Buried in the output is: > > > >> > > > >> TypeError: panelView.contentArea is undefined > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 12/15/2021 2:03 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > > > >> > I will have to come back to that, it is something I > > consider > > > to be not > > > >> an > > > >> > easy setup, so need to figure it out. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 8:48 AM Greg Dove wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Ok, so I just did > > > >> >> ant runmxtests > > > >> >> and it ran the swf tests, they passed. > > > >> >> So it looks like this is failing in js tests. I need > to > > > figure out how > > > >> to > > > >> >> run those... > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
