I had compiled with Maven.... I have tried the other two compilations that I 
know of:

a) asconfigc: (same results).

- "WARNING - variable Animation is undeclared".

- Does not work in IE11



b) ant: (same results)

In this case, the svg's used in the TDJ are not shown.



c) as3: I can't compile, what extension do I need? I thought I had ALL of them 😝



Hiedra



-----Mensaje original-----

De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>

Enviado el: domingo, 12 de diciembre de 2021 19:55

Para: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>

Asunto: Re: IE11 takes several seconds to load



I compiled using asconfigc and it worked too.



> On Dec 12, 2021, at 8:53 PM, Harbs 
> <harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:

>

> I just compiler TourDeJewel and it worked, although the TriState Checkbox 
> does not seem to work as expected. I’m guessing I’m missing the correct CSS 
> files.

>

> I used ant FWIW.

>

>> On Dec 12, 2021, at 8:42 PM, Maria Jose Esteve 
>> <mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> wrote:

>>

>> Sorry, animate is not an attribute, it is a method...

>>

>> -----Mensaje original-----

>> De: Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> Enviado 
>> el: domingo, 12 de

>> diciembre de 2021 19:35

>> Para: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>

>> Asunto: RE: IE11 takes several seconds to load

>>

>> - SimpleLoader uses the "animate" attribute (this seems the most correct 
>> because in IE CSS transformations give a lot of problems).

>>

>> - When we compile TDJ we get a warning:

>>

>> WARNING: 
>> D:/Develop_Royale/Projects/Royale-SDK/royale-asjs-fork/examples/jewel/TourDeJewel/target/javascript/bin/js-debug/components/SimpleLoader.js:73:
>>  WARNING - variable Animation is undeclared

>>       this.components_SimpleLoader_animation = /* implicit cast */

>> org.apache.royale.utils.Language.as(this.element["animate"]([{"transf

>> orm":"rotate(0deg)"}, {"transform":"rotate(360deg)"}], timings),

>> Animation, true);

>>

>> The generated code is:

>>

>> components.SimpleLoader.prototype.set__indeterminate =

>> function(value) { if (this.components_SimpleLoader__indeterminate !== value) 
>> {

>>   this.components_SimpleLoader__indeterminate = value;

>>   if (this.components_SimpleLoader__indeterminate) {

>>     if (!this.components_SimpleLoader_animation) {

>>       var /** @type {Object} */ timings = {"duration":1000, 
>> "iterations":Infinity};

>>       this.components_SimpleLoader_animation = /* implicit cast */ 
>> org.apache.royale.utils.Language.as(this.element["animate"]([{"transform":"rotate(0deg)"},
>>  {"transform":"rotate(360deg)"}], timings), Animation, true);

>>     }

>>     else

>>       this.components_SimpleLoader_animation.play();

>>   } else {

>>     if (this.components_SimpleLoader_animation)

>>       this.components_SimpleLoader_animation.pause();

>>   }

>> }

>> };

>>

>> Animation is an interface defined in royale-typedefs (public interface 
>> Animation extends EventTarget) but yet it doesn't seem to recognize it... do 
>> you know what this is telling us?

>>

>> Hiedra

>>

>> -----Mensaje original-----

>> De: Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> Enviado 
>> el: domingo, 12 de

>> diciembre de 2021 1:15

>> Para: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>

>> Asunto: RE: IE11 takes several seconds to load

>>

>> A little more research...

>>

>> If we execute the example of the TDJ, of the SimpleLoader[1], in IE11 it is 
>> not shown, in this case it does not delay the loading of the application, it 
>> simply does not work [2].

>>

>> [1] https://royale.apache.org/tourdejewel/#!progressloader_panel

>> [2]

>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Uip8pe3QrZM4bNhFHHpBfQKvcychLegp/vie

>> w?usp=sharing

>>

>> This error is "known", I have found a lot of information about it,

>> and I have tried some of the solutions specified, and ... I am

>> testing some changes in SimpleLoader... (I'm sure Carlos could give

>> us some light on this... I see his comments...)

>>

>> Hiedra

>>

>> -----Mensaje original-----

>> De: Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> Enviado 
>> el: sábado, 11 de

>> diciembre de 2021 23:01

>> Para: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>

>> Asunto: RE: IE11 takes several seconds to load

>>

>> Hi Hugo, I don't know if I have understood the situation correctly... 
>> correct me if I am wrong:

>>

>> - We have a problem with minification in Release.

>> - We have an initial loading problem produced by using 'animate' from 
>> 'SimpleLoader' BUT it ONLY occurs in IE11.

>>  It has been ruled out that it is only with Office 2016/365 why do you 
>> comment that you have simply excluded it from compatibility?

>> - It has not been clear to me if the OS, in this case W10, is also present 
>> in our equation.

>> - The TEST application "with a simple label" loads the Add-In, right?

>> 😝

>>

>> These are the assumptions that we know?

>>

>> One question... are you using @externs with .js inclusion normally?

>>

>> Hiedra

>>

>> -----Mensaje original-----

>> De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com<mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com>> 
>> Enviado el: sábado, 11 de

>> diciembre de 2021 13:24

>> Para: Apache Royale Development 
>> <dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>

>> Asunto: Re: IE11 takes several seconds to load

>>

>> I decided to not support Office 2016 for Windows.

>> It's easy to remove from the manifest file.

>>

>> Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com<mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com>> 
>> escreveu no dia sábado,

>> 11/12/2021

>> à(s) 11:40:

>>

>>> Hi,

>>>

>>> About Add-In, Microsoft reports that the application starts with a

>>> blank screen and it's true (almost a minute).

>>> It takes a long, long time to show the first screen (only happens

>>> with IE11).

>>>

>>> I tested with an application with only a TEST label without anything

>>> else and even so, takes several seconds to show the label (on Edge,

>>> Chrome, Safari open instantly).

>>>

>>> This is a know issue ?

>>>

>


Reply via email to