Just an observation. In Ant distribution frameworks/libs does exists, but it doesn't contains all those swc which you are seeing in stacktrace. It means that Maven distribution is somehow "telling" trough maybe some configs that I should use frameworks/libs swc instead frameworks/js/libs...
pt., 5 mar 2021 o 17:32 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > It should work in both. > > Chris > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. März 2021 17:04 > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: PRs ready for distribution alignment > > That options is working whether I build distribution in root folder of sdk > and "distribution" folder as well ? > > pt., 5 mar 2021 o 17:00 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > napisał(a): > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > If you don't explicitly define the profile "option-with-swf" it's the > > JS-only version. > > > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. März 2021 16:11 > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > Betreff: Re: PRs ready for distribution alignment > > > > Chris, > > > > frameworks/libs doesn't exists at all. > > > > What occurs to me that I actually don't know what kind of distribution > > package I'm building. Is it js-only distribution or is it js-swf > > distribution ? > > > > Thanks, > > Piotr > > > > pt., 5 mar 2021 o 15:41 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > napisał(a): > > > > > Hi Piotr, > > > > > > this is strange ... from the log output it seems as if the > > > "frameworks/libs" doesn't contain any of the libraries. > > > Could you please confirm if the directory really doesn't contain them? > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. März 2021 12:19 > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > > > Betreff: Re: PRs ready for distribution alignment > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > Thanks for all work. After rebuilding whole framework I just tried > > > produce distribution by going to the folder of it and do: > > > > > > mvn clean install > > > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > > > > > > It works without doing set > > > distributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution. > > > > > > I went to Moonshine and tried to build with produced distribution > > > our project and I got following errors - I won't post here full > > > stacktrace [1] > > > > > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/c2qv1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Piotr > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pt., 5 mar 2021 o 10:10 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I have, as far as I know, finished the work on aligning the Maven > > > > built and the Ant built distribution. > > > > A few things have changed in the Maven distribution compared to > > > > the earlier ones: > > > > > > > > > > > > * All scripts (in the bin and js/bin) directory are now identical > > to > > > > the ones in the Ant distribution. > > > > * The manifests are no longer contained in a "manifests" > directory > > > but > > > > are in the same location as they are for the Ant build. > > > > * I now include the sources of the projects, which should > simplify > > > > debugging. > > > > > > > > The probably most important change is that I no longer have copies > > > > of the scripts and main manifests in the distribution resources. > > > > These resources now only contain the empty dummy files needed by > > > > FlashBuilder. It seems these were updated in the project, but the > > > > copies weren't. Therefore, the scripts as well as the manifests > > > > weren't identical in Ant and Maven distributions. I solved that > > > > problem by now taking the exact same files and copying them in the > > > > assembly. The manifests needed minor tweaking which I am now doing > > > > via > > > an XSLT in the build. > > > > > > > > Also did I refactor everything just needed for FlashBuilder > > > > support out into a separate assembly file. This way we have all > > > > the stuff that doesn't seem to make sense in one place and if we > > > > should decide to drop FB support, we just need to remove that > assembly descriptor. > > > > > > > > Would be cool if you could give the changes a try. > > > > > > > > Please note that you need to checkout the feature branch > > > > "feature/distribution" in both the compiler as well as the asjs > > > > repo (For some reason my addition of the ACE typedef seems to have > > > > gone to the develop branch of the typedef repo, so it should > > > > already be > > > available. > > > > > > > > Hope you like the changes and hope they work for you the same way > > > > they do for me (I think Carlos also reported that he was > > > > successfully able to compile every example he tried in VSCode with > > > > it) > > > > > > > > The two PRs needing merging after review are: > > > > Feature/distribution allignment by chrisdutz * Pull Request #180 * > > > > apache/royale-compiler (github.com)< > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/pull/180> > > > > Feature/distribution allignment by chrisdutz * Pull Request #1087 > > > > * apache/royale-asjs (github.com)< > > > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/pull/1087> > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
