If necessary, I believe that we can create our own custom playerglobal.swc without running into license issues.
Basically, the official playerglobal.swc contains only the APIs, and no implementation, so it's basically like the typedef/externs SWCs that we create for JS libraries in Royale The Apache Flex repo contains full ASDoc XML files for playerglobal.swc under an Apache license. These files should contain enough information about variable/property types and method signatures that someone could write a parser to get all of the data we need to generate AS3 stub classes and build a SWC from that. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 11:07 AM Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let’s wait and see whether we are dealing with real issues or not. If it’s > an issue we can debate solutions. > > I’m happy to ask my Adobe contacts what the plan is. > > > On Jan 3, 2021, at 8:52 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > Hi Harbs, > > > > the problem here's that I think we are on Apache, and using a piece of > > software that is under a clear license use will be against the foundation > > rules. So although you or I can host the files, that's not seem to me > like > > a solution to the real problem. > > > > I'm for go step by step and first try to talk with Adobe representatives > to > > get the permission for Apache to host the player files only for our flex > > and royale use cases. I think we could continue discussion after we know > > the solution to this request > > > > Can you, Alex or others do this request? or if you want I can do it, but > > need someone to provide me the contact at adobe. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > El dom, 3 ene 2021 a las 15:59, Harbs (<harbs.li...@gmail.com>) > escribió: > > > >> There’s no license agreement when downloading playerglobal or the > content > >> debugger. > >> > >> I’m willing to take the risk to personally host these files if > necessary. > >> > >>> On Jan 3, 2021, at 4:47 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> And I doubt we would be allowed to simply upload Adobe stuff to any > >> other server wirhout explicit conset from them. The license agreement > you > >> agreed to when downloading explicitly forbids that (at least it did, > wenn > >> we were working on the Flex Mavenizer and I doubt things changed) > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC > > *Apache Software Foundation* > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > >