No, arr[0] has an instance of a custom typed object.
El sáb., 6 oct. 2018 a las 10:58, Piotr Zarzycki (<piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Are you trying to distinguish something from simple type by that if(arr[0]
> is Class) ? By simple type I mean String, Boolean?
>
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018, 10:54 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I'm very new to Language.as, so I'll try to do my best.
> >
> > I'm trying to add to Language.as "is" function this:
> >
> > if(rightOperand === Class) {
> > return typeof leftOperand === 'function';
> > }
> >
> > the test case is :
> >
> > var arr:Array = [main]; //main is a container declared in MXML, so is not
> > class is an instance
> > if(arr[0] is Class)
> > {
> > trace("is Class");
> > } else
> > {
> > trace("is NOT Class"); // I expect to get this trace
> > }
> >
> > but browser reports:
> >
> > [Error] ReferenceError: Can't find variable: Class is (Language.js:147)
> >
> > So first point to solve is how to deal with "Class", since is not
> > recognized at javascript level. Seems to me that "Class" should be solved
> > at compiler level?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > El vie., 5 oct. 2018 a las 23:11, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid
> >)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Use of "is" is transpiled into a call to Language.is. I think
> > Language.is
> > > should special case the test for Class. Try updating Language.is and
> see
> > > if that is what you need.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 10/5/18, 11:13 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > in js, check if something is a class or is an instance is like this
> > [1]
> > >
> > > typeof myFunc === 'function'
> > >
> > > In Royale since we are using AS3, doing
> > >
> > > if(something is Class)
> > > do this
> > > else
> > > do that
> > >
> > > should work either for SWF and for JS, but seems is not the case.
> > > I must make two codes COMPILE::SWF (with "is Class") and
> COMPILE::JS
> > > (with
> > > typeof ... ==='function')
> > >
> > > Could we have this abstracted by compiler?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F405164%2Fbest-method-of-testing-for-a-function-in-javascript&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca4d898cf20fe4f072a9008d62aee4d24%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636743600312034959&sdata=fdiolpGWQJihoZw2PfYLmoyckh1mDiynH8EbJXYIeog%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ca4d898cf20fe4f072a9008d62aee4d24%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636743600312034959&sdata=bwLXrUQ6N4syATPB8iEXL%2BnFZPQl9xhIndqwNbCShCo%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
