As long as you're willing to confirm the software works with 2.0.6, go
ahead and revert it to that older version. There apparently is some
value in remaining with the default (or, as you say, correct) version of
Tiles defined with the Struts version we're using:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2191009/struts2-with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2. Also,
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2191009/struts2-with-tiles-2-1-or-2-2>apparently
Tiles 3 will be supported in the upcoming 2.3.9 version of Struts 2:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13337938/how-to-integrate-struts-2-with-tiles-3.
Glen
On 04/06/2013 02:43 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
Glen,
Reverting to the correct version 2.0.6, just needs clearing out the
compiled jsp's from the webapp work directory, as there is a tag attributed
not supported in 2.0.6.
Cheers Greg.
On 5 April 2013 17:44, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
OK, I indeed see that Tiles 2.0.6 is the default for Struts 2.3.8:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_**
3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&**view=markup<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/struts2/tags/STRUTS_2_3_8/pom.xml?revision=1422545&view=markup>,
and it looks like we've been upgrading our Tiles versions away from the
default for quite some time now: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**
roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=**915340&r2=917207&pathrev=**917207&diff_format=h<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/roller/trunk/pom.xml?r1=915340&r2=917207&pathrev=917207&diff_format=h>
.
If there are bugs that would be fixed by reverting to it, that might be a
good idea. But you're saying the opposite is the case, we are apparently
now relying on 2.1.x functionality in our code that won't work with 2.0.6.
Unless we see otherwise, I wouldn't automatically assume Struts 2 is so
fragile that it can't work with more recent versions of Tiles, and would
hate to have to upgrade one just to take advantage of a more recent version
of the other. Tiles was spun off as a separate project so there is already
a loose linkage between the two. If a more recent version than the default
is shown to work with Struts2 *and* it has functionality we want to use,
there shouldn't be a problem in us using it.
Glen
On 04/05/2013 12:14 PM, Greg Huber wrote:
Glen,
Trying it out with version 2.0.6 it gives this error?
ERROR 2013-04-05 17:06:55,182 BasicTilesContainer:render - Error rendering
tile
org.apache.tiles.util.**TilesIOException: ServletException including path
'/WEB-INF/jsps/tiles/tiles-**tabbedpage.jsp'.
...
....
Caused by: javax.servlet.**ServletException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.tiles.jsp.taglib.**InsertAttributeTag.doFinally()**V
at
org.apache.jasper.runtime.**PageContextImpl.**doHandlePageException(**
PageContextImpl.java:865)
at
org.apache.jasper.runtime.**PageContextImpl.**handlePageException(**
PageContextImpl.java:794)
at
org.apache.jsp.WEB_002dINF.**jsps.tiles.tiles_**002dtabbedpage_jsp._**
jspService(tiles_**002dtabbedpage_jsp.java:178)
....
roller is pretty much standard, so it should work.
Cheers Greg.
On 5 April 2013 16:46, Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why is 2.1.4 "non-standard"? Checking the site, they're already up to
2.2.2 as GA: http://tiles.apache.org/
Glen
On 04/05/2013 11:42 AM, Greg Huber wrote:
Does any one know why roller uses a non standard version of tiles?
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.tiles</****groupId>
<artifactId>tiles-core</****artifactId>
<version>2.1.4</version>
</dependency>
It should be 2.0.6. I remember looking at this before and it would not
work with this version???
Cheers Greg.
