Zixuan, thanks for handling this.

-Lari

On 2025/06/24 07:17:21 Zixuan Liu wrote:
> I submitted https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24451 to fix this.
> 
> Thanks,
> Zixuan
> 
> Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> 于2025年6月20日周五 05:12写道:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > ExtensibleLoadManager tests are broken in branch-3.0 and branch-3.3.
> >
> > Example build failures:
> >
> > pulsar-ci.yaml for branch-3.0 (ExtensibleLoadManagerImplTest is in
> > broker group 1 in branch-3.0):
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/workflows/pulsar-ci.yaml?query=branch%3Abranch-3.0
> > In many cases, the failing ExtensibleLoadManagerImplTest triggered an
> > OOME in branch-3.0 since the test framework improvement
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21467 was missing from
> > branch-3.0.
> > I have cherry-picked that now, so OOME won't be an issue in the most
> > recent build.
> >
> > pulsar-ci-flaky.yaml for branch-3.3 (ExtensibleLoadManagerImplTest is
> > in the flaky group in branch-3.3):
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/workflows/pulsar-ci-flaky.yaml?query=branch%3Abranch-3.3
> >
> > I've been triggering CI builds for maintenance branches after
> > completing a batch of cherry-picking and before performing releases.
> >
> > The last successful build for branch-3.0 pulsar-ci.yaml workflow was
> > on May 20th (before 3.0.12):
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/runs/15132614429
> > revision:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commits/76e5479efdca225b138c0370989431731787cd90/
> >
> > and the last successful build for branch-3.3 pulsar-ci-flaky.yaml
> > workflow was on May 16th (one commit before 3.3.7 release):
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/actions/runs/15062146251
> > revision:
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commits/529ed8e60cc1c8c2e12a58031dddc6babdebb182/
> >
> > I haven't yet investigated the reason and whether there's a commit
> > that introduces a regression.
> > I'm sharing these details so that others are also aware of the current
> > state of the branch-3.0 and branch-3.3 maintenance branches.
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> 

Reply via email to