+1 (binding)

- validated source artifacts
- checked sha512 checksum
- checked signature
- validated binaries


Regards
Jiwei Guo (Tboy)


On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 4:50 PM Nicolò Boschi <boschi1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified the checksums and signatures
> - Ran simple test to validate the staging repo on jdk21
>
> Nicolò Boschi
>
> Il giorno gio 12 dic 2024 alle ore 22:22 Lari Hotari
> <lhot...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Validated source artifacts
> > - checked sha512 checksum
> > - checked signature
> >
> > Validated binaries
> > - ran sample app
> >
> > -Lari
> >
> > On 2024/12/12 17:14:09 Chris Bono wrote:
> > > Following PIP-205: Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar (
> > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17335), this is release
> > > candidate 1 for the Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar, version
> 0.5.10.
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will
> stay open
> > > for at least 72 hours ***
> > >
> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). Binaries in the Maven
> repository
> > > are provided for convenience.
> > >
> > > Source package:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/pulsar-client-reactive-0.5.10-candidate-1/
> > >
> > > SHA-512 checksums:
> > >
> 9d9a2182443851f1f0c9b23f6003087ec3cb48c4ee3dcc5c2c896f456e3a1f050ce4e1ffb6cc828da2ffc52c5305f646dfe01ecfa2dc178bcd4c685e93b5369c
> > >  pulsar-client-reactive-0.5.10-src.tar.gz
> > >
> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepulsar-1321/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > > v0.5.10-candidate-1 (047ad9b2376d51998c84d1237c39632e8d6d65ad)
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive/releases/tag/v0.5.10-candidate-1
> > >
> > > Please download the source package, and follow detailed instructions
> > > for pulsar-client-reactive release validation at
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive/wiki/Releases#validating-release-candidates
> .
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
>

Reply via email to