My concern is about having a formal process that requires an approval vote. I consider that as slowing or blocking ideas. To me the whole reason to have the contributor repository is to unblock development of new ideas.
> On Oct 17, 2024, at 6:04 PM, lushiji(apache) <lush...@apache.org> wrote: > > Then I will initiate a formal PCIP submission process so that everyone can > know or give feedback. > Do you think it is okay? Dave > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:31 AM xiangying meng <xiangy...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> IMO，It is necessary to make it known for important features. >> As for PCIP, a clear PCIP can help later generations better understand >> and maintain this feature. It can also help users better learn to use >> this feature without having to look through the code. >> But this does not mean that a vote is needed. I wonder if it can be >> carried out after being known for a period of time and there is no >> objection? >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 10:20 AM lushiji(apache) <lush...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> The current PCIP is an open discussion. If I am wrong, please correct me. >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Your suggestion is very good. Pulsar-java-contrib is an open repository. >>> I am not sure about the necessity of PCIP. The original idea of building >>> this PCIP is to make some larger Improvement Proposals known to the >> Pulsar >>> community to prevent the project from being deformed. >>> >>> If the PCIP process is simplified to just make developers of the Pulsar >>> community known, do you think it is necessary? >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 1:24 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> This is in no way a comment about the proposed work. In fact that work >>>> should proceed. >>>> >>>> This is about what looks like extraneous process. I thought that the >>>> purpose of this new repository was to streamline and ease the >> development >>>> of new ideas and contributions. Adding a new PCIP process seems to be >>>> contrary to this purpose. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>>> On Oct 12, 2024, at 5:24 AM, Denovo1998 (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org >>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Denovo1998 commented on code in PR #8: >>>>> URL: >>>> >> https://github.com/apache/pulsar-java-contrib/pull/8#discussion_r1797693657 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ########## >>>>> pcip/TEMPLATE.md: >>>>> ########## >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ >>>>> +<!-- >>>>> >>>>> Review Comment: >>>>> Added in https://github.com/apache/pulsar-java-contrib/pull/9. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. >>>>> To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the >>>>> URL above to go to the specific comment. >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: >>>>> us...@infra.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>
